2007-02-23 10:45:24 · 3 answers · asked by joseph w 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Wrong section. Try again.
2007-02-23 10:52:24 · answer #1 · answered by Bleaarg 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How Historical of you...(wrong section, sorry, although, i guess it is histoical....)
to answer your question... i think modern magic has had to step up, not bcome a third-rate reflection of it's former self... modern magic has to really really shock... back in the day, a man levitating was amazing, beyond words. now we just go "wires, david blaine,seen it before..."
I think magic has got better. My favourite thing is where they know that you know how a magic trick is done, so they do it a new way. You're saying "it's behind his elbow(for example)" then he shows you it's not. so you go, "so if he didn't do it how i was expecting, how the heck did he do it?" it's a whole new dimension. so i think; modern magic, better than previous magic.... old magic is third-rate. we all know the tricks. it's the new tricks that really baffle us.
2007-02-23 19:21:13 · answer #2 · answered by mexican_seafooduk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Magik has many books. How do you rate caliphate demo gorgon by its name? You don't. Never by name!
Every book has a seed. Plant what you find. Always remember that Magik is but misunderstood practical technique and tomorrow technology.
2007-02-27 00:46:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋