I think its wrong, and ppl who are pro-abortion and are going to vote for hillary on 08 please leave this page
2007-02-23 10:14:50 · 19 answers · asked by monkeyluver13 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Maybe in nature, the animals that are gay are the ones that could not establish dominance, could not get a mate, and are left do die without continuing their legacy, which is natural I guess, natural selection. Being gay is a choice people are free to make, but I do not think it is right. If there is such a thing as a gay gene, how can it be passed on?
2007-02-23 10:23:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
What right do you have to tell me to leave this page? I'm unlikely to vote for Hillary, but a person with any intelligence would wait and see who the candidates are. Maybe I'll vote Republican if they find a decent candidate. Being gay is neither right or wrong. It just is the way some people are. Science has identified a different gene present in gay men. Therefore, God must have created gay people. Perhaps it was to teach us tolerance. Sounds like a good lesson for some people who appear to lack a concept of tolerance and acceptance.
2007-02-23 10:24:32 · answer #2 · answered by David M 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I know that it's 'quite okay' to be gay ... and I'm not 'pro-abortion' but am totally against it, although I don't believe the 'abortion laws' are wrong ... and I don't have a 'clue' who I'm going to vote for yet, but I doubt it will be Hillary Clinton, unless she comes up with something that makes me think she'd make the 'best' President at the election.
2007-02-23 10:34:31 · answer #3 · answered by Kris L 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing wrong with someone being gay. Physicians often choose whether a hemaphrodite at birth shall be male or female in appearance. A man's mind in a woman's body? Or a woman's mind in a man's body. We can not reasonably judge another person based upon whether or not they are gay.
I would much rather have a warm and thoughtful gay or hemaphrodite as a friend, then a selfish, coniving, thieving, fool, who happens to be a heterosexual.
I don't believe any person should be allowed to take control of someone elses body. I'm not pro or con regarding abortion. I would not want someone to keep me from having a life saving surgery, nor would I want to be the guinea pig for an experimental drug.
Please help to establish a large, diverse, & representative ethical oversight committee for managing the National Security Agency (NSA)
The National Security Agency (NSA) by necessity currently collects information from ALL organizations without representative ethical oversight. This includes the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, National Guard, ALL Political Representatives, FEMA, Greenpeace, the Medical Community, Insurance Companies, Research Groups, domestic or abroad, ...
Unfortunately, special interest groups not representing All Americans currently have access to direct and use Confidential data collection; which affects everyone, not just the US. Imagine large corporations influencing the prosperity of businesses based upon racial criteria; the NSA makes this possible.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-YW18nxE7eqtd0CMJGCB94Xu4?p=57#comments
The NSA currently does not have a system (people and software) to parse the great amounts of information available to create prioritized situational awareness for the benefit of "representative ethical oversight". Imagine a corporation influencing all that is associated with a University research project, to force access, or force a sale of intellectual property at a significantly lower cost. Now expand the ability of this corporation to influence all businesses, everywhere.
Please support my initiative to establish a large and diverse representative ethical oversight committee for monitoring and managing the NSA.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-YW18nxE7eqtd0CMJGCB94Xu4?p=57#comments
Respectfully,
James Dunn
2007-02-26 07:48:00 · answer #4 · answered by jamesbdunn 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
First, being gay is not a choice; it's not a "right or wrong" issue. Second, no one--except for complete morons--is "pro abortion". Why is it that pro lifers cannot for the life of them comprehend the difference between pro abortion and pro choice. They are as different as apples and oranges.
The only way I'd vote for Hillary is if she's running against a Republican. Wait a minute. She WILL be running against a Republican. Guess I have to leave.
2007-02-23 10:24:53 · answer #5 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Ha! What an asinine question. If being gay is "wrong" then so is being White, or having blue eyes. Homosexuality is genetic so if you're pissed about the queers then ask your God why he designed a flawed genetic code. Are you so insecure in your own sexuality that homosexuals frighten you? You know who else thought being gay was "wrong"? Hitler. He thought it was so wrong in fact that he slaughtered them the tens of thousands. He also though Jews, Gypsys, Slavs, Blacks, the handicapped and the retarded were also wrong. Guess what he did with them? Now by no means am I saying that you are kin with Adolf, but you certainly seem to subscribe to a few of his delusional theories. A hatefull heart is the dominion of the devil. Perhaps you need to reassess your priorities and focus your ire on a more productive and viable topic. I wish you luck.
2007-02-23 10:30:08 · answer #6 · answered by Odin 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A lot of the people that are going to vote for Hillary or are pro-abortion may think "being gay is wrong". I think that any homosexual act between the same sex is wrong.
2007-02-23 10:25:02 · answer #7 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well now...is being straight right? (Humourous Intent)
I don't believe that being Gay is neither right nor wrong.
I also don't believe that it is a choice.
Nobody in their right mind would choose such a "lifestyle"...Who would choose to have the public hate you? Not in your right mind!
Who would choose to be a target of ridicule? Not in your right mind.
It is almost like being mentally ill...Who would choose to be? Only people not in their right mind. Which means...that they are already mentally ill.
I am suggesting that people who are gay are just not in their right mind.
I am also sugguesting that it is NOT A CHOICE!
When you hit puberty...try remembering...when did you first get your "stiffy" being attracted sexually to someone else? Not those indiscrimnating ones that were bothersome for a time but the one when you were first attracted to another? Now for me I was looking at a woman (I am a man if you didn't notice the Mr. in my name)...a pregnant one at that...I do not remember making a choice to get "stiffies" looking at women. It just kind of happened that way..
As I didn't make a choice in the matter I cannot for the life of me think that most others are all that much different.
Unfortunately for the gays they get their stiffies naturally looking at others of the same sex. Their brains are not wired correctly. They are NOT IN THEIR RIGHT MIND.
I don't think they make a concious choice.
However I do think that ACTING on their impulse is SIN. Acting on it is a choice.
Being straight I can be attracted to another woman who is married. If I acted on my impulse and had sex with her I sin. That is adultery and oral sex is sex regardless of what Slick Willie had to say. (That's why his "willie" was slick if you hadn't figured that out yet)
So is being straight right? Do you see why the question doesn't make sense?
Thanks be to God Almighty that Jesus died for us on the cross at Calvary and covered a multitude of sins.
So I know that they will be forgiven because they are not in their right mind to begin with.
2007-02-27 09:22:12 · answer #8 · answered by mr.gold 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i am pro-Hillary and have no intention of going by this question.
i am anti-abortion and believe that all life is sacred.
i am a firm believer that being gay or straight is perfectly ok. sex is one of the greatest parts of being human. we are all social creatures who want and need to DO IT. my choice is with a woman (or solo). i don't feel judging the gay community is my business. if that's their sexual preference, let them go for it.
what's important is being sexually happy and content; not being forced to hide one's sexual identity. america was built on the concept of freedom. so allow it.
2007-02-27 06:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a Pro-Life, Hillary-Hating, Conservative. And yet, I believe that if you want to be gay, that's your choice. We didn't make this country to interfere with your life; we made it to give the common man freedom. And that means freedom to be gay, if that's what you want to do.
2007-02-23 10:30:52 · answer #10 · answered by NoLeftTurn 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋