English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-23 10:07:22 · 4 answers · asked by max_arad 1 in News & Events Other - News & Events

4 answers

Maybe it already did?

2007-02-23 10:14:27 · answer #1 · answered by higg1966 5 · 1 0

Just like Neil said above me, the sooner the better.

And that comes from a Lebanese... i know it's not politically right to hope that another country invades my own, but in Hezbollah's case, politically right is not necessarily right.

Hezbollah is the only "so-called-lebanese" party that has a military arm, that is besides the palestinian organizations inside the refugee camps.

Hezbollah's contiunous refusal to disarm, their cleverly hidden "democratic demands", their Iranian agenda and their Syrian ties alongside the on-going sit-ins in Downtown Beirut (which is causing the halted economy millions of dollars, forcing businesses to close down indefinitely, putting hundreds if not thousands of employees (thus families) out of work all make the perfect ingredients for a disaster.

So, no matter how bitter it is to go through another war, but i believe this one is inevitable and frankly, necessary.

2007-02-26 03:54:21 · answer #2 · answered by dr.smokes 2 · 0 0

It's not going to start...Israel didn't had much success last summer ,so I don't think they are going to try it again,especially that now there are UN forces there...and I don't know how happy the countries who's soldiers are there would be to see the troops caught in a middle of a war...
As for another civil war in Lebanon...I don't think so.I don't think that the Lebanese will allow another civil war there...

2007-02-23 23:08:18 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0 0

Well. The sooner. The Better.

2007-02-23 10:44:03 · answer #4 · answered by Neil C 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers