2007-02-23 09:37:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hannity hasn't always been "too old". Now, let's hear those excuses!
2007-02-23 10:41:54 · update #1
'just the facts"....why do you feel the need to defend sean? Are you yet another of those yellowbelleis that claim to support the war but won't go fight like hannity?
2007-02-23 10:43:06 · update #2
because its very easy to support a war you won't die in
2007-02-23 11:16:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sean Hannity does more for our country in one day than you and the ilk like you do in a year. His right as an American to speak his mind has not been rescinded nor has freedom of speech been overturned by the Democrats YET. Your question could only be answered bu Seam Hannity, since he is the only one that would know the answer. Addressing him as chickenhawk may lower your chances of a civil answer.
2007-02-23 18:02:41 · answer #2 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe that Hannity is a member of the armed services, that would be my first guess. Because he is a proponent of keeping the troops in Iraq, and the fact that he is not in uniform does not disqualify him from having a opinion ! Hell, if that were the case, every dick head in congress would have to shut their stupid mouths. Hmmmmm! That doesn't sound half bad !
2007-02-23 18:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure Hannity is a little old to enlist in the military at this point. Why is it you guys yell about your right do dissent and then anyone who supports the war you are all over them? What about their free speech rights?
2007-02-23 17:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is a little too old if you havent noticed, why dont you have the courage of your own convictions and fight US troops in Iraq. If Sean is a chickenhawk does that make you a chickenshiite?
2007-02-23 17:44:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
He did not want to murder innocent babies, children, women, and civilians in an imperialist war for oil. I wouldn't either, but if I did have to fight, I would fight for Saddam Hussein anyday against George Bush. I would not give it a second thought.
2007-02-23 17:41:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Have you ever seen his gut? He'd never pass basic training.
2007-02-23 17:47:23 · answer #7 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they refused to provide him body armor
2007-02-23 17:42:08 · answer #8 · answered by Mike_Hustle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He gets pay more beating up stupid Americans in the USA
2007-02-23 17:43:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Take the word chickenhawk and remove the hawk part. There's your answer.
2007-02-23 17:40:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋