No way. Think about it a moment..... what good is it? It could never become a family heirloom because in 50 years who will even know who Britney Spears was--let alone care?
2007-02-23 09:25:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by S D Modiano 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I can think of a hell of a lot better things to spend $1 million dollars on than hair.
2007-02-23 17:21:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chewie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! That is BEYOND weird.
**Weirdest Question Award**
P.S. - Not trying to be mean with that award thing. Just saying that it's weird for people to buy famous people shaved off hair.
2007-02-23 17:30:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL No. I heard on a gossip column that the reason she cut off her extenstions is because she thought the lice was "eating" them.... LOL!! Gotta love the gossip.
Even if she was sane....no
2007-02-23 17:24:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Why do you ask? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I need some hair.
2007-02-23 17:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gross..NO!!I got sick just looking at those nasty pictures of her dyed hair.I feel sorry for the looser that DOES buy her hair
2007-02-23 17:22:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by lala 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no. It looks just nasty. I'd rather feed a small country if I had an extra million dollars.
2007-02-23 17:23:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by *Cara* 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I would. Then I would give it to one of those places that make wigs for women and girls who have or have had canser.
2007-02-23 17:25:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by maggie jane is the best 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No not that loser's hair It probably has cooties or junk
2007-02-23 17:21:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by icesk8ergirl2180 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
HA. If I had that much money I'd spend it on something much more worthwhile!
2007-02-23 17:26:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by piratewench 5
·
0⤊
0⤋