simple you paid them off. you spew out more poultants than the rest of us. the rise of china will put you in 2nd place soon though.
apologize for what; telling it like it is. seems that america is reverting back to being isolationists again.
2007-02-23 10:13:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by mowhokman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Given the UN's BS in the past and the fact they are against the US, I can see how this would come about. It took them almost 6 months to OK the attack on Iraq and that gave Saddam ample time to transport and hide the WMDs. Look at all of the times they have hit Israel with lame resolutions but they've NEVER given the Palestinians with any even though the Palestinians have been murdering innocent people for the last 60 years.
Go figure, eh?
2007-02-23 09:32:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
At this cutting-edge 2d in time i think of there is little evidence the two way. On urgent themes like this i come across that this is ultimate to easily pretend that they do no longer exist. you notice if the concern does not exist then there is not any concern. And in case you think of the concern could be coming lower back, then you certainly close your eyes, positioned your hands on your ears, stick your tongue out and then in simple terms shake your head around till you get dizzy. Then the concern is long gone lower back. Or in case you intentionally stub your toe then you certainly would be distracted from the concern. in extra incredibly off subject count word can absolutely everyone help me with a query. i'm in my fourth year of examining at St Georges medical college, aiming to be a wellness practitioner. I incredibly have already taken in an pastime in continual heart surgical treatment. despite the fact that i these days heard that a robotic arm waiting to accomplish an difficult existence-saving heart operation is being pioneered by potential of uk surgeons. So in the top is absolutely everyone in simple terms going to be a robotic? and how can we reproduce if we are robots?
2016-10-16 08:30:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I knew the Kyoto treaty was flawed.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/?page=article&Article_ID=13988
Regardless, I still believe that a switch to H2 is vital for the Economic and Military surety of the USA. Such a switch will essentially destroy the funding mechanisms of the terrorists and strengthen our economy to unparallel heights.
2007-02-23 09:16:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Russia and all the other ex European eastern block countries included as being part of Europe in that report finding. Anyway I don't believe it.
2007-02-23 09:02:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Narky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Better technology, Outsourcing of Heavy industry. High standards on Auto emissions.
2007-02-23 09:01:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by type2negative 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As fuel prices are higher there, Europe still uses a lot of diesel fuel as it's more efficient but also more polluting.
Then again, most people have small cars and don't drive big SUVs to work.
2007-02-23 09:03:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends what you mean by green. We all know that the USA can 'prove' anything they want to. What's the betting Neil Armstrong could swear that the moon is made of green cheese?
2007-02-23 09:42:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by cymry3jones 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
what there talking about is that the USA has cleaner water (in Europe no one drinks tap water bec its polluted) . The US has more natural resource more trees. But Europe laws are stricter laws on pollution
2007-02-23 09:02:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Monet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 minute you Americans are rubbishing the UN saying they are corrupt and a waste of space and should be done away with. The next minute you are asking questions like this.
2007-02-23 09:13:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋