English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In his speech in Australia, Cheney welcomed China's help in N.Korea negotiations and then castigates their military saying 'they were at odds with the country's stated peaceful aims.'

I am glad Mr. Cheney thinks only the US of A retains the right to aggressively strut the world killing and maiming. or Is he worried our military can only take on world minnows?

This paranoid moron needs to be impeached... right?

2007-02-23 08:48:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

china would kick are *** and the US owe's alot of money to china for buying all our debt to pay for this stupid war.

2007-02-23 09:09:32 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0 0

We need ANOTHER enemy right now to detract from Iraq. In a year we'll be threatening another 2 or 3 nations.

Dannyk as one of the top 2 polluting nations on earth, I don't think the US should complain about China. As to human rights violations, there is this small issue of Iraqi civilian deaths that you may have heard about. We've killed more of them in four years then China has killed IT'S OWN civilians in decades.

2007-02-23 08:56:17 · answer #2 · answered by Nicnac 4 · 0 0

i can inform you're approximately 15 years previous via fact basically toddlers think of that there'll be some large conflict between China and the U. S.. in case you prefer to correctly known the fact, it would be close to disastrous for any u . s . a ., which incorporate China, to attack america. even nonetheless they have extra numbers, we've extra ideal technologies and it would be particularly severe priced for them to even attempt. On ideal of that, there is not any real reason at the back of them to accomplish that. Why attack a u . s . a . which you at the instant are not at conflict with, basically to spend billions upon billions in doing so? For what features? whether they took the united states of a, they might could carry it, and that should take hundreds of 1000's of troops to accomplish that. you apart from mght could do no longer forget that China has 1000's of billions, and maybe trillions, of greenbacks invested in u . s . a .. they have bought our bonds and own lots of our companies and sources, and with the aid of attacking us, they might surely be wiping that slate clean. China isn't seeking to grow to be a large international military means. they are seeking to enhance as a u . s . a . in terms of economics. returned, it rather is barely the toddlers who watch too many video clips that fantasize approximately China attacking the united states of a. could u . s . a . ever fall, it rather is going to be with the aid of politics and economics and not over conflicts at palms.

2016-11-25 19:38:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

although i agree that america acts too much like imperialists, i do not agree that cheney deserves to be impeached. why impeachment?

any country should fear an attack by china. any country should want china as its ally. that is where i think we are going with china anyways: they want our companies to do business with them. t*t for tat. (i don't want the word spy machines to kick this answer out simply for that phrase).

we don't want china our foe since its population is so high that its army of foot soldiers would kick some real butt anywhere it went. they don't need many weapons: their numbers are vast!

if i were inside of your skin, which i'm not, i wouldn't trust north korea if you paid me. look up how they have been helping the iranian scientists reduce the uranium and have had them as guests to witness their nuclear warhead testing. i won't be one bit surprised if middle eastern terrorist-producing countries allign themselves with north korea, which despises all western countries, not only the usa.

2007-02-23 09:03:10 · answer #4 · answered by Louiegirl_Chicago 5 · 0 0

China is the greatest polluter and abuser of human rights on the planet so I guess they have the right to "strut" as well.

2007-02-23 08:52:52 · answer #5 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0 0

Cheney is paranoid about everyone: from the postman to the Prime Minister of Iceland.
He thinks everybody's out to get him. Let's hope somebody does.

2007-02-23 08:56:25 · answer #6 · answered by Fidel Castro 2 · 0 1

Chaney was a moron years before he ever was Vice President.
He is only conservative when the outcome determines the number of brain cells to use on a problem.

2007-02-23 08:56:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Leery is the politically correct word. We are not increasing the size of our military, even though we are at war. Impeached? On what grounds? Because you dislike him?

2007-02-23 09:01:03 · answer #8 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1 0

China military is outdated and they have 1.3 billion people to protect. The build up seems make sense to me.

2007-02-23 12:25:54 · answer #9 · answered by Hans A 2 · 0 0

China scares me, too, but Cheney scares me more.

2007-02-23 08:51:57 · answer #10 · answered by Year of the Monkey 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers