English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Of course, this is mere speculation.....but.....

If the chemicals, persay, were "unable" to co-exist in a volitile formula, and some even didn't exist to begin with....

We'd still be doing standard combative fighting with guns, cannons, rockets, knives, hand-grenades, chemical warfare [as in WWI with mustard gas & such would probably be re-introduced once in a while], "regular" bombs and shells from airplanes.

WWII with the Japanese was quickly stopped after the second series of H-Bombs dropped. August 6th, then 9th, 1945. The first bomb did not get the Japanese to surrender, so the second bomb was dropped - then the war with Japan (WWII, in fact) was over (Germany had surrendered months before). It was often speculated that the human cost of the bombs would be smaller than allowing the war to continue along (along the standard warfare). It was seen as kill a few thousand Japanese now, verse loosing thousand of Americans later. It was a matter of numbers and attempts to halt the war as quickly as possible.

The war would have continued without the H-Bomb for probably a couple more years until resources for the Japanese ran dry (as with Germany and fuel), and the loss of many of their young men, (moral), and fighting huge China to the West would have eventually caused Japan to eventually give up.

We can only guesstimate what would have happened if there were not the incredibly intelligent physics and other engineers and scientists that came available to America. Either way, war is horrible, never forgivable, too much loss of young men's (and civilian) lives on all sides, crippled bodies, crippled economies, low morale, debts, crimes unreported - unjudged - known only to God. What does He think of us? Really?

022307 3:45

2007-02-23 08:47:33 · answer #1 · answered by YRofTexas 6 · 0 0

Germany became into no longer basically the 1st united states to discover the aptitude of Nuclear Fission And this is potential, yet in addition the region the place usa Even have been given this is very own Plans Off After Germany's Defeat! the sole reason Germany in no way controlled To Take It That Step added In Time became into because of the fact it got here Too late; Germany became into Already drained Of supplies And Manpower, And Now dealing with the possibility of A Soviet Invasion, which skill The project (And regrettably Germany As an entire) got here To An end.

2016-10-01 21:13:15 · answer #2 · answered by hardage 4 · 0 0

Besides not having Dr. Strangelove,

The war would have lasted a lot longer in the Pacific. Many thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of Allied soldiers would have died.

The Japanese were a fierce warrior race at the time and would not surrender. The fighting on the Island would make Iraq look like a picnic.

2007-02-23 08:29:54 · answer #3 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 1 0

Well I can tell you this,,, If we had not used the bomb on the Japanese the war would have dragged out for many more years, and cost many more lives. Up until that point the Japanese had no intention s of surrendering ! But even without there use, the end would have been the same !

2007-02-23 08:34:53 · answer #4 · answered by g_man 5 · 1 0

The US would have lost a lot more lives invading Japan and the world would have already been through WWIII.

2007-02-23 08:28:42 · answer #5 · answered by you did three things wrong 2 · 0 0

Dr. Strangelove would not have been made and that makes me sad.

And we would have two more atomic bombs in storage.

2007-02-23 08:27:14 · answer #6 · answered by Bryan 3 · 2 1

We would be walking around saying Hail Hitler....maybe.

2007-02-23 08:28:08 · answer #7 · answered by Smarty Pants™ 7 · 0 1

Godzilla would now rule us all.

2007-02-23 08:29:17 · answer #8 · answered by It's just me! 5 · 0 1

"we would probably be answering this in German"

I thought it would be Japanese?

2007-02-23 08:29:03 · answer #9 · answered by Suzy Suzee Sue 6 · 0 1

we would probably be answering this in German

2007-02-23 08:27:38 · answer #10 · answered by A 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers