would you donate to charity?
2007-02-23 08:12:37 · 12 answers · asked by Don't Follow Anyone 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yes because I support causes like the Humane Society
2007-02-23 08:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by Brainiac 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are a number of articles posted on my website related to this exact question.
If 10% of the average $907 that Americans spent on Christmas gifts went to children in need, 42 million children could be helped for an entire year according to statistics provided to me during an interview with World Vision.
This year, I conducted an experiment, and asked for donations to World Vision and Heifer.org instead of Christmas gifts. Many folks simply chose to give me gifts anyway, but several did make donations instead, resulting in $137 going to these charities.
I also have a website where I sell art to support these two fine charitable organizations. The next time you need art for your office, church, or home walls, please consider my website. My personal favorite of my own work is Sunset over Florence12. There are two other artists/photographers who are participating on my website with donated works.
http://finerworks.com/gallery.asp?U_ID=RLTabor
Best Regards,
Rick Tabor
2007-02-24 05:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by Rick T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If it was distributed equally in the world then there would be no need for charity.
2007-02-23 08:19:21 · answer #3 · answered by girlG 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we'd be the two adverse short-term. The cream consistently rises to the right and can start to have extra beneficial than the lazy and the ignorant. besides it might set the international widely used of residing lower back approximately 4 hundred years and take approximately 2 hundred years to get lower back to the place we are immediately.
2016-10-16 08:25:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha
but I heard the other day & I'm not 100 % sure the exact amount
if that was done every one would have $3 million each or it may have been one million
but that made me start to think of all the money I could have hahaha
2007-02-23 08:19:17 · answer #5 · answered by ausblue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there would be no need for charity, and by giving you would give somebody else more money, and then the people who received charity would become the upper class. that would be horrendously confusing. NO.
2007-02-23 08:16:03 · answer #6 · answered by kate 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's communism.
2007-02-23 08:15:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep. But I'd prob have less money than I do now.
2007-02-23 08:17:01 · answer #8 · answered by RIVER 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there would be no need for charities
2007-02-23 08:15:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep sure would...wait.. if it was distributed equally then wouldnt they have a share...♥
2007-02-23 08:15:06 · answer #10 · answered by just peachy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋