Real and valid questions are being raised by the criticism coming from the democrats (and many republicans) concerning Bush's strategy in Iraq. We've seen several troop escalations in the region that have failed to bring about the hoped-for stability. What would be irresponsible would be to NOT question a dubious plan of action put forward in favor of blind support for an idea simply because it's proposed by the president.
2007-02-23 08:19:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tim 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
hardly ever. the american public has a short interest span so this public coverage will be historic historic past by the point the 2008 elections roll round. with reference to "the warfare on Terrorism" the in effortless words question it remains answered is what is going to the Demonrats do now that they administration Congress. the position's their plan? Will the liberals decrease and run like the French or will they stand and grant? Survey says "liberals lead a retreat from Iraq and Afghanistan." The Satanic Islamic terrorists will strike on American soil lower back following that spineless retreat. What became performed on 9/11 became hardly ever an act of stepped ahead terrorism. What would have made it extra genuine became to have hijacked those 3-4 planes 2 days earlier and flown them proper into the stadiums the position the NFL became conserving a number of it really is season starting off video games. The stadium with the least in attendance became nicely over 50,000 followers in eco-friendly Bay, Wisconsin. it really is discounting the gamers, crew and media. imagine gasoline being dropped in simple terms earlier effect at the same time as nicely over 2 hundred,000 individuals some on fireplace, others obviously in panic mode, and nevermind the useless and maimed. Osama bin weighted down ain't were given no longer some thing in this ex-particular forces operative. All stuck on community, community and nationwide television - the few lives that were lost on 9/11 light in evaluation to what's in save for u.s. once the Demonrats renounce and retreat. the reliable information is that lots of the terrorist assaults will target significant metropolitan parts. Blue territory. So the precise human beings the liberals say they're representing turns into victims of terrorism. i love it at the same time as a plan comes jointly!
2016-12-04 20:45:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by sobczak 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They beleive it is an escalation and will result in more violence.
However, I feel that over the entire course of the Iraq war the democratic minority has done nothing but whine and complain - they've offered no real alternatives. Previously, democrats had complained that Bush made no changes to policy in Iraq. Now, he makes a change (for good or bad) and they complain about the change.
2007-02-25 08:06:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may be a way to WIN in Iraq and democrats are afraid of winning and can't even say the word their hate for America is so bad. have you ever heard them even mention winning anything no only retreat and surrender
It is a Defeatacrat/surrender monkey thing to want your own country to be losers as the Defeatacrat/Dimwitacrat Party has in past two elections 2000 and 2004
2007-02-23 08:23:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aside from asinine lies and hatred directed against the President, perhaps there's an underlying strategy involved to attempt to get President Clinton off the hook for his regime change in Iraq plan. 31 Oct 1998 Iraq Liberation Act http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/libera.htm
Or his wife?
2007-02-23 10:41:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think not to send them is wrong. We have troops on the ground fighting every day and to not send more to help win this war is wrong.
2007-02-26 11:29:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by vancealot2001 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think its about Democrats its really about sending more of our people over there to fight a war that is no longer about us. We should have went over and found bin-laden brought his butt back here to stand trial and be done with it. There is no way that country is innocent in any of this and at some point enough is enough. Were sending money to them to rebuild but what about our own country? We have more and more people losing their homes (forecloseurs are at an all time high due to unemployemnt) but no relief from our own government. We have elderly not being cared for properly due to budget cuts in programs for them yet we send more money to rebuild another country. I think thats what its really all about we need to stop helping other countries and stop sending our loved ones over to fight other peoples wars.
2007-02-23 08:22:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by deedee l 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think the defeatocrats aren't taking responsibility for their votes for the war in iraq in 2003 and just want to pull our troops out not thinking of the consequences!
2007-02-23 10:48:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some like it, some do not. I bet more people agree that your use of the English language is an atrocity than agree on Bush's war plan!
2007-02-23 08:18:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by wildraft1 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
LIBERALS QUESTION AUTHORITY
I personally think they are just finding another reason to yell at Bush because they can't get over the fact that they lost 2 years in row
this is what im talkin about
2007-02-23 08:17:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Broken Twig 2
·
0⤊
1⤋