English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Giuliani supports many democratic and even liberal issues. McCain supports some democratic, and, some liberal issues, and, has sparred other Republicans on the hill from time to time.

2007-02-23 07:28:34 · 9 answers · asked by Firesidechat 2 in Politics & Government Government

Sensible, not senible

2007-02-23 07:29:54 · update #1

9 answers

My campaign managers would be telling me to act the same way just to put myself as far from Bush as I could.

2007-02-23 07:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by mjnarva 1 · 0 0

Is this a sensible man? Giuliani is arrogant, bigoted, ill tempered and a womanizer. He divorced his 2nd wife, Donna Hanover, by announcing it at a press conference instead of telling her first. He was having an affair with an aide living at Gracie Mansion while still married and mayor of NY and he took credit for all the good things that were done by others in NYC. He fired William Bratton; the police commissioner in 1994 when he found out he made the cover of Time magazine because he (Giuliani) wanted to take the credit for the innovative crime fighting. I lived in NY during his dictatorship, and believe me, I would not want him as president. His character is far worse than Bush & Clinton's worse faults rolled into one, if you can believe that's possible. His name should be Mussoliani.

As for 9/11…. he’s no hero, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The real heroes of 9/11 were the NYC firefighters & police plus all the other forces from the surrounding tri-state areas who voluntarily came to pitch in & help us.”

OK, here'a a link from Newsweek:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17081159/sit...

His resume:
http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=7ebb4b22-83ac-4da6-8073-c70a66166ea5

2007-02-23 07:47:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I was for McCain 2000 but he is creeping over to the right to secure the nomination. Him and Giuliani will have a tough time winning over social conservatives. Watch out for Romney though, he will be in the race for the long haul.

2007-02-23 08:14:01 · answer #3 · answered by jcsalenik 2 · 0 0

Why do the democratic frontrunners look less sensible than any in recent memory? Barack? Hillary? Give me a f-ing break...

I wouldn't vote for McCain or Guilani for their sake, but I would vote for them to keep Hillary out of office.

2007-02-23 07:34:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You need to look a little deeper into Giuliani. As a New Yorker I can tell you that he is far from sensible. And I'm not even talking about his cross-dressing.

2007-02-23 07:33:57 · answer #5 · answered by diogenese_97 5 · 0 0

Ron Paul's working for the Republican nomination. we've mandatory a presidential candidate for a lengthy time which will return us to the form and we finally have been given him. Dr. Paul (he introduced babies formerly starting to be to be a member of Congress) has remained consistent to the small government ideas that one and all Republican applicants declare to have self belief in. he's between the few actual combatants of the Iraq conflict in Congress (maximum Congressmen voted for the conflict and various the present combatants will merely vote for a meaningless decision incredibly than against the appropriation to fund Bush's surge). he's the main economically literate guy or woman in Washington and acknowledges that something government does is often going to fail (some examples; the conventional public college equipment's reforms that usually fail, the introduction of a Welfare classification that refuses to paintings by using the Welfare application, the introduction of prepared crime by using Alcohol Prohibition and its prolonging by using Drug Prohibition, The growth/Bust enterprise Cycle which the Federal Reserve is responsible for, and so forth.). he's firmly for the form, which includes Enumerated Powers (which states that the Congress merely has the legislative powers that's extremely granted by using the form). The correctness of this Strict Constructionalist interpretation of the form is obvious, considering the undeniable fact that it may never have been ratified if each guy or woman thought it may desire to have given upward thrust to special government. It became fairly ratified besides (it took a assure of a invoice of Rights, the critics of which mentioned could get rid of any rights no longer notably enumerated in that invoice; be conscious that argument confirms strict constructionalist interpretation of enumerated powers; in any case the ninth and tenth Amendments have been made to guard the rights no longer enumerated and neutralize that possibility). After residing by using 6 (quickly to be 8) years of George W. Bush's massive government, why no longer choose a valid small government Congressman, who has remained consistent in his positions for 30 years? by using electing Ron Paul president, we've of project to defeat massive government and convey back the form.

2016-12-18 09:32:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

As opposed to what? That gang of misfits the democrat party trotted out last time?

A chaingang would look more credible than that sub human farce.

2007-02-23 07:33:18 · answer #7 · answered by Curt 4 · 0 0

You're comparing McCain to... McCain in 2000?

What other Republican frontrunners were there?

2007-02-23 07:32:30 · answer #8 · answered by Vegan 7 · 0 0

They have to spout quasi-Democratic rhetoric because they know the American public is sick of the Republican rhetoric.

2007-02-23 07:45:41 · answer #9 · answered by tmlamora1 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers