English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the us government allocated $1M dollars to each american familly ,they would still not come close to what they spend on overseas "mis"adventures.Uncle sam would be well advised to keep his money home with his familly so we won't have to starve,or suffer with poor health and job insecurity.How about it, If I gave 1M dollars to each American familly would you not vot for me as the next president of the good ol us of a.(Aye)

2007-02-23 06:59:53 · 8 answers · asked by merlyn-canaid 1 in Politics & Government Government

8 answers

You need to learn some basic math, im sorry to say.

There are 104,000,000 families in America.

At $1,000,000 per family

That comes out to 104 trillion dollars

otherwise, more money than the United States will get in tax revenue over the next 30 or 40 years combined !!!!!!

The cost of Iraq, is about $3,000.00 per family so far.

2007-02-23 07:22:53 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1 0

Just curious... Do you actually know how much of the US Federal budget is spent on overseas aid, etc.? Most Americans think it's anywhere from 20% to 35%, many polls show.

It's actually much, much smaller - less than 1%, in fact. And it's actually been shrinking as a percent of Federal spending.

These numbers do NOT include things like the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or any military activity. Just humanitarian foreign aid spending.

So, do you want to restate your question?

2007-02-23 07:09:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We would no longer be a democracy. People die coming across the borders to achieve a dream - we all have the freedom to make our own fortunes.

If we 'gave' each family 1M - we'd no longer have any use of jobs, achieving, etc. We'd then be a different country than we are now.

So sorry, I would not vote for you.

2007-02-23 07:04:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the main suitable factor for our voters is powerful distant places coverage. this could be a political question and is a lot greater complicated than basically compassion. do no longer enable compassion blind you from substitute perspectives. individuals are lazy ignorant ideas controlled zombies. there is not any excuse for homeless in our united states of america. If human beings could desire to be sure the sunshine and the two needed and have been keen to artwork for a greater physically powerful way of existence they might have it. This in turn might go away a mass of supplies for people who unquestionably want counsel.

2016-09-29 12:52:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Wouldn't it be simpler to just stop giving that money overseas, balancing the budget, and then giving everyone a tax break?

2007-02-23 07:08:30 · answer #5 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 0 1

all the money they spend could really give every usa citizen good health and dental insurance

2007-02-26 10:43:04 · answer #6 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

I wonder how much they spent on 911 and all the jobs that were lost because of it.

2007-02-23 07:06:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If you did that then no one will want to work and we would all sit idle and do nothing.

2007-02-23 07:07:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers