either way I'm sure she was much too bright to get wrapped up in politics.
2007-02-23 06:18:37 · 17 answers · asked by pip 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
most of you got the jist of the question.. but a few have confused liberal and conservative with democrat and republican.. being liberal or conservative is a mind set, not a political stance. Please keep this in mind while answering this question.
2007-02-23 06:35:32 · update #1
Both. Her religious beliefs would be very conservative, as a Catholic. However, she had a great deal of compassion for the down trodden and the sick more like one would expect from a liberal.
2007-02-23 06:22:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Liberal
2007-02-23 06:27:38 · answer #2 · answered by Sean 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, some conservatives are falling into line with McCain, at the instant are not they? talking as a conservative, it rather is so lots extra ideal amazing than the Dems falling into line on the returned of their candidate, via fact McCain, Hillary and Obama are all so comparable. for my area, I won't vote for McCain. Voted for Ron Paul. At this component it rather is beginning as much as seem as though i could ideal be writing him in, in November. quite time will tell.
2016-11-25 19:15:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She believed that if you were truly saved that you should suffer here as Christ suffered. Truth be told she was quite mean though she thought she was doing the Lord's bidding.
She cared for the people of the world that she felt suffered as Crist did. To others she wasn't nearly as pleasant. At one point she was used as a pawn by the Catholic church.
My guess is she did not think with her heart byt rater her mind....therefore whe was a Conservative.
2007-02-23 06:24:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
conservative. She was devout Catholic ergo, conservative. As for politics technically she was a politician on her own. She spread the word of the Catholic Church. She helped the needy, but...she did have regulations as to who exactly got helped. (not saying she didn't do a good thing overall) She was deeply involved with the politics of the Catholic Church.
2007-02-23 06:30:54 · answer #5 · answered by Chrissy 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mother Teresa was a saint, she never spoke bad of either party. She was to busy trying to save people not worry about who is a sorry a** President.
2007-02-23 06:28:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Social conservative, fiscal iberal. I think she was kind in the middle.
2007-02-23 06:45:59 · answer #7 · answered by cynical 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't even imagine. She had to at sometime have to ask "why the suffering"? As far as lib, con? her mind could have not been further away, in order to focus on what was at hand.
2007-02-23 06:25:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
She followed Christ's ways, thus a liberal.
2007-02-23 06:31:23 · answer #9 · answered by Beau D. Satva 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
she was a christian socialist regarding economic policy and as conservative as they get on sexual issues. I heard her give a commencement address where she basically said all the women in the class were sluts for not protecting their virginity. No blame for the guys who were boinking them.
2007-02-23 06:22:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋