2007-02-23 06:18:03 · 8 answers · asked by tracy t 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
In the case of a national emergency, martial law is often imposed to maintain order and minimize crime. Martial law is where the military intervenes in civil affairs.
Under normal, peaceful circumstances, minimal government control and intervention is usally the best policy.
2007-02-23 06:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's not possible there is greed involved so a desirable outcome will never be an option unless people stop whining and start doing.
2007-02-23 14:59:37 · answer #2 · answered by GoodQuestion 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer a government intervention that didn't result in death and destruction but instead resulted in people being fed, clothed, sheltered, educated, or protected from harm.
2007-02-23 20:24:04 · answer #3 · answered by edith clarke 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The one that left the largest amount of common people unnafected.
2007-02-23 14:21:10 · answer #4 · answered by ian_eadgbe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An outcome that does not screw things up worse, which is unusual.
.
2007-02-23 22:43:51 · answer #5 · answered by Zak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would rather they not get involved at all in most casesbut,if they do, it would be best if they limited the harm they do.
2007-02-23 14:24:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
improving somebody's well-being without hurting anybody else
2007-02-23 14:43:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
correction of market failure
2007-02-23 15:21:21 · answer #8 · answered by ???? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋