English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Alot of people on the other side of the political spectrum also called Clinton evil for supporting abortion and partial birth abortion and the whole Monica thing. I really do not feel that there is/was some evil master plan for either president, but that (all conspiracy theories aside) they were/are men trying to do what they feel is right for the country (no matter how competant they were/are in doing it). Do you feel this way.
I find it interesting that alot of people who hold to moral relativism and consistantly refer to people who do horrible things as "misunderstood" are now suddenly adopting the word "evil" to label our president.
Also many of these people, who, when approached on a spiritual matter usually tell us we should not judge, now seem to suddenly be the experts and judges of Bush's intentions.
What do your think?

2007-02-23 05:57:05 · 20 answers · asked by Bob S 1 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

I think G-Dub is ok. He made some bad decisions in terms of the Iraqi occupation. What I really like about him is he hasn't bowed to liberal pressure. He seems to tell them, just like me, go f yourself, I don't care what you think. After 8 years of the Clinton appeasement machine, it is fresh to see a President stick to his guns even if they're at times misguided. The fact is this nation is resiliant and when his term is done, if his decisions turned out incorrect, we can change course and correct. I don't believe most of his decisions were incorrect, they just kind of spit in the face of the liberal agenda.

I don't remember a whole lot of "evil" name-calling towards Clinton. You understand the conservative m.o. is not protest. You don't see us in the streets protesting this and that, except the pro-life freaks who really aren't conservative, we initiate change through political and economic pressure, as liberals say "we got the money".

2007-02-23 06:29:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Too many people think of Bush in terms of Iraq only. He lowered taxes for everyone and did away with the marriage penalty which helped me and I' far from the 1% of the wealthy that Dems say are the only ones who got a tax break. I also know that no attacks by terrorists have occurred on American soil in over 5 years. I think he has been criticized much too harshly by Americans who get all their news from TV and only hear the bad because the media hates him. I respect him for doing what is right regardless of polls. Most who answer polls aren't educated enough to answer the questions anyway. I say he is OK and even better.

2007-02-23 06:15:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

How can anyone think he is incompetent? Clinton lost almost twice as many soldier's lives without a declaration of war. Where were the body counts from the media then?

Partial birth abortion makes me cry! Don't liberals watch their children get born? How could anyone be for that after seeing a child be born?

2007-02-23 06:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 1 1

Nobody in the world has an 'evil' plan. Everybody does what they think is right or what serves their goals and ideals. Bush's ideals are highly debatable and his ways are very inconsiderate of his own people and the people of the world. I, personally, think Clinton was a great statesman. It's sad that the American people let a personal issue like Monica make them lose a man that was working for the welfare of his people and the world.

2007-02-23 06:03:16 · answer #4 · answered by Princess of Egypt 5 · 1 1

I don't think he is evil at all. I think he is doing the job he was voted in TWICE to do. The American public is a fickle one, things don't go their way and they turn on the President in a second. This is a nation with so many different views and beliefs, he can't please everyone all the time.

2007-02-23 06:05:19 · answer #5 · answered by Mitchy 2 · 3 0

Incompetent.

2007-02-23 06:17:57 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 0 1

Incompetent.

2007-02-23 06:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0 1

I think he is great he brought us back from the brink, now the left seeks to make us lose again and humiliate us and later tell us we are or were bad and then hike taxes to make us pay for being bad.

I have seen this b4 it is the same old play book.

2007-02-23 06:00:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i think that he's incompetent, since you can see (if you search for him in pics) online that he's aged quite a bit since he first became prez. i don't think that he's done the best job that he could have. thankfully, i missed the vote because i was a few weeks too young last time. i honestly wouldn't have voted for him, that's for sure.

2007-02-23 06:03:42 · answer #9 · answered by amymrgrt 4 · 1 1

How do you think of a guy feels understanding he has 2 presidential retirement funds after he masterminded the reaping of each and all of the wealth from 2 international locations he ought to in all hazard scouse borrow by potential of his being the right in charge of one united states being president then attacking yet another oil wealthy united states and taking administration of the very organic source makes funds from on a similar time as being the president making the militia take charge of this different international locations oil faucet and controlling the output of that faucet to a similar oil reserves OPEC is pumping from a similar pool. He ought to sense very wealthy reason no person knows the trillions of greenbacks he has reaped from his place of work on a similar time as being in charge of the faucet of one of the biggest oil components in the international.he will ought to stay along with his circle of croanies for something of his days haunted by potential of the techniques he brought about all this death and destruction for to make funds for a awful greenback. he has to comprehend he's hated. yet in simple terms a socialpath could be waiting to forget approximately relating to the worlds dislike and hatred for each and all of the grief he has brought about the international. He could be sitting downthere in texas on his ranch retired and not being concerned as he did on a similar time as he replaced into gazing our adverse youngsters dieing from IED explosions from human beings attempting to get us out their united states. For funds is all he he did it for.you are able to't tell me any american benifitted from his asserting conflict in a dessert united states and not een revenge for 9/11 provides him suitable to declare conflict on iraq

2016-10-16 08:15:06 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers