http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1592455,00.html
2007-02-23 05:47:02 · 12 answers · asked by wyldfyr 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Rumsfeld owes everyone an apology for ever even getting involved in this country.
2007-02-23 05:50:26 · answer #1 · answered by alco19357 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nobody, McCain utilized his freedom of speech. Fact is that whether Rumsfeld made mistakes or not it is true he will probably go down in history as just that. I certainly don't think he was the best but not the worst either.
History doesn't always represent the truth. He was the Secretary of Defense therefore he will get the fingers pointed at him.
McCain's statement somewhat takes the weight off of Bush's shoulders and allows McCain to still justify the surge in Iraq claiming it was mismanaged by Rumsfeld without upsetting the Republican political base.
Therefore the "no comment" from the McCain campaign.
2007-02-23 06:19:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney does. Even if McCain was in the wrong, Cheney needs to be taken down a notch.
2007-02-23 05:51:44 · answer #3 · answered by YoungBeezy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cheney needs to apologize to the American people-McCain who?!
2007-02-23 05:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by sally sue 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither, McCain is grandstanding blow hard. That never passes on an opportunity to get some media attention. He will never be president. On top of that he is a hypocrit. He doesn't even want to follow his own campaign finance reform law.
2007-02-23 05:57:07 · answer #5 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO apology's from either
They can have their opinions of one another
Even if Mc Cain is a trader to the Party and the country
2007-02-23 06:41:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither Cheney just thought McCain was a little too harsh.
2007-02-23 05:50:40 · answer #7 · answered by George G 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I see the Liberal attack bots are out in rigidity and incredibly than answer your question, prefer to make death desires against him. yet this is liberals for you. No tolerance for people who do no longer trust them. As to conflict crimes, Cheney has no longer been indicted on any yet Obama fairly would be for Solyndra and quickly and livid. a minimum of he must be. The Bush administration a minimum of tried to learn concepts from enemy combatants - unlike Obama who prefers to offer orders to assassinate out of the sunshine of regulation. i comprehend hypocrisy once I see it yet then I do think of for myself. try it sometime.
2016-10-16 08:13:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that they both owe each other apologies for starting stupid stuff like this. it only happens during the election times, because otherwise it's not a hot topic. there thing is as bad as the anna nicole smith thing. i mean, really, people!! don't start stupid arguments because of ego and wanting to be right and show people up.... :X. sorry. >.<. i get all crazy with politics....
2007-02-23 05:52:33 · answer #9 · answered by amymrgrt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither one. Let them fight. It looks better for the Democrats who have their own feud going between Barack and Hillary.
2007-02-23 06:21:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋