2007-02-23 05:43:23 · 8 answers · asked by Year of the Monkey 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
That's funny but also sad in a real way. Now, some places they're going from the term "Human Resources" to "Human Capital". We're not even resources any more we're capital. Pretty soon we'll be so dehumanized that they'll take the whole human part out of it.
2007-02-23 09:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In fact slavery in many forms does still exist in many modern societies. Cambodia is notorious for it's sexual slavery that includes not only women, but thousands of children who are either abducted or sold into sexual slavery by their families.
2007-02-23 05:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by Marvelissa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! It might even be called "Human Resources Commodities".
2007-02-23 05:59:39 · answer #3 · answered by napqueen 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If there were still slavery I'd be at home with a few of em' in the back yard cleaning up.
2007-02-23 07:48:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mindrape 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, a Human Injustice, just like It was.
2007-02-23 05:58:45 · answer #5 · answered by elliebear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-23 06:13:29 · answer #6 · answered by howlettlogan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they would be called "Blue-Collar Workers", lol!
But jokes aside, I think they would be called "Free Labor"
2007-02-23 06:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by silhouette 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, you don't work where the state is your employer.
2007-02-23 05:53:09 · answer #8 · answered by SouthernAnswer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋