ANOTHER ORWELL SAYING. AGREE?
2007-02-23 05:43:09 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Danibel K ,the liberals whooped his a** in WW2? My father fought during that time. He was an old school dem. Puh-leeze do not put todays libs in the same sentence as yesterdays dems. BTW,most people back then didn't go around calling themselves liberal or conservative.
2007-02-23 05:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I never supported Bush, not in 2000, nor in 2004. But I strongly supported the Iraq War when it began and continued my support for it for some time. However it is clear to me now that Bush lost the war for us on March 19, 2003. He lost it in many ways, by not understanding the difference between a Sunni Muslim and a Shia Muslim, by invading with only 135,000 to 150,000 troops when the 1991 Gulf War took 560,000 troops, by not being able to admit a mistake and plan for an armed insurgency in 2003, etc.
2007-02-23 05:54:50 · answer #2 · answered by Raindog 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Small international branch: I in simple terms finished examining "Down and Out in Paris and London," his memoir of his stories as a semi-intentional bum in the international's 2 stunning capitals of the time. What I have been given from it replaced into that he seen it a toss-up which style of poverty replaced into worse: Being worked to death as a dishwasher in a Paris eating place, or having his existence micro-controlled via the British equipment of "helping" the destitute. It wasn't a tremendously photograph in the two case. it quite is evident the place he have been given the muse to place in writing "Animal Farm" and "1984." I examine someplace that he chosen the call "George Orwell" as a pseudonym by using fact he concept it sounded "ordinary" and that's how he wanted the universal public to think of of him. Why his made-up call could sound any diverse than his actual one is a secret to me. perhaps you would be British to tell the version.
2016-12-17 17:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by andie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its the quickest way to start another war.
2007-02-23 05:53:04 · answer #4 · answered by George G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Nuclear Age has changed that a little bit.
2007-02-23 05:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Agreed. Just ask France.
2007-02-23 05:51:01 · answer #6 · answered by Michael E 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You will have to ask W. He lost this war the day he fired Shinseki for telling him he needed 250k+ troops to win, and went in with less then half of it.
2007-02-23 05:48:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is the French rule of warfare.
2007-02-23 05:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by earl justice 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey Sparky, you cons lost this war before it began cause you have no understanding of the region.
YOu cant even define what winning means in iraq.
Dont tangle with your liberal superiors. It makes you look foolish!
2007-02-23 05:47:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋