Yes. Of course it has. Terrorists and terrorism have pretty much always existed. But, what is happening today is a deliberate, concerted utilization of terrorism for profit. There is a "Big Picture" to the terrorism today. The tribal people of the Middle East had not risen above their neolithic differences to align and form a lasting union of tolerance among themselves, as other nations of the world already had, when greedy foreigners descended upon those lands and began to plunder the oil there. Royalty and tribal elites were bribed. And, the CIA was used by U.S. oil interests, including those belonging to the Bush family, to deliberately destabilize the region for control and to prevent the people in the Middle East from uniting and controlling the oil themselves. Halliburton had the contracts to build the Al Qaeda training camps. Our new Secretary of Defence, Gates, was the man assigned to teach the Al Qaeda forces how to fight back when the C.I.A. used them against Soviets. The U.S. eployed the use of Al Qaeda forces through 1999 in Bosnia. Bush's oil company, Arbusto, is business partners with the Bin Laden family and, as a gesture of friendship, gave Osama's brother, Salem, the Houston Gulf Airport in Texas. Bush and his family and his associates significantly helped to create the terrorists that our soldiers fight today. And, they deliberately contributed to the chaos and suffering of innocent people there. The people of the Middle East, betrayed by their corrupted leaders and weakened by such foreign powers, failed to rise to the realities of the 20th century in time for the 21st. And, their future is grim. Middle Eastern oil production peaks in 2012 and ends in 2070. The plunder of Middle Eastern oil is now a piggy-fest of who gets control of the remaining oil there. The societies there, so long destabilized, have disintegrated into episodic chaos and heightened religiosity as the quality of leadership plummeted. Foreign and local elite oil interests, concerned about security for their pipelines and oil fields now that factions of local power mongers, freedom fighters and religious fanatics threaten to disrupt the efficient flow of oil out of the land, placed foreign troops, including those from UK and U.S., in the region to ensure enough, but only just enough, stability to get the oil out. Many U.S. soldiers there now report that all they do is guard oil fields and a flow of oil profits that go to only a few people in the world. Even the plunder has grown chaotic with an estimated 500,000 barrels of oil going "missing" every day, securing someone's power in the future as oil begins to run out. $20 Billion U.S. taxpayer money that Bush sent in cash with his man Bremer was "lost" there recently to people who most assuredly participate in the "terrorism" trade. Bush marches through the region and wants to invade Iran now to lock up the pipeline routes. He is asking taxpayer for $622 BILLION more! He has not said what he wants that money for, though. And, he refuses to state his "plan" for Iraq. He just says he has one. In order to have an initial foothold for the plunder march through the region, the U.S. pays Israel $30,000 every year bribe for every man, woman and child, plus, has given them weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons which the Isrealis have recently threatened (then denied) to use against the Iranians. Those are the only WMD known in the region aften ten years of searching for more. The search for WMD is a propaganda ploy to convince ignorant U.S. taxpayers to keep supporting the "search". It is a ploy because arms dealers and their activities are well known by U.S. intelligence. Now, with a Democratic Congress and worldwide disgust for Bush and Cheney's lying and plundering and unspeakably irresponsible plundering of our own nation's financial security while racking up the largest national debt in the history of mankind, there may be some reasonable approach that will be considered and some way to help the people of those regions who have been disarmed and are now at the mercy of roving gangs of religious fanatics and other factions. Bush stated during the Presidental debates that "there would be NO nation building" there, though. He has no intentions whatsoever of promoting democracy there, unless it submits to his plans. Bush has no respect for the democracy in the U.S. He refuses to listen to the will of the American people or to our Congress. Remember, Bush does not represent the American people. He represents the oil interests and war profiteers. He and his gang have done nothing but destabilize and weaken the United States. Bush has aligned himself and his interests in the U.S. with the Christian Evangelicals, 40 million strong, whose leadership reported last fall in "Faith and Nation" that they advocate for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government if their religious agenda is not made into legislation. And, they are preparing to fight their neighbors. Bush is contributing to the creation of even more terrorists in these Evangelical fanatics. Bush and his family supported Saddam when it suited them. They support whomever goes along with them or is most easily bribed with U.S. taxpayers' money. Bush supports the Shiites now because they seem the most easily "managed" and exploitable or amenable to the "Big Picture". That may change from day to day, depending upon the vagaries of the chaos. Bush hails from a family with a history for supporting terrorists. Bush's grandfather, Prescott, supplied at least one/third of Hitler's raw materials before President Rooselvelt and the U.S. Congress stopped him specifically with the Trading with the Enemy Act. When the oil runs out in the Middle East, U.S. oil interests will disarm and abandon Israel and the Middle East to the remnants of their "terrorism" trade and practices.
2007-02-23 05:50:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if there was another terrorist attack in the U.S. I would be more against the war in Iraq than I am now. The war in Iraq has nothing to do with the war on terror. A real war on terror is not fought with 160,000 troops in one place. It is fought with special ops forces around the globe where terrorists exist. Apparently Bush thinks all the terrorists in the world are now in Iraq. This war has made us less safe.
2016-05-24 02:49:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People who have conscience and don't want destroy other people won't have to worry about world war.
All the poor people who are in the cross fire of stupidity suffer for their ignorance and evil. If you think what they do is for the good then why are people dieing. Evil is evil no matter what.
I hope what is going on in Iraq and other Islamic countries will understand what will happen due to no education other than what so called holy men tell them.
I'm not saying that all countries are Innocent but genocide for the sake of thinking that they will go to heaven better think twice.
Brain washing people for their own gain is just pure wrong. Look at footage's of men AND children in the streets with assault rifles.
Who in their right minds would let this happen?
Who would let their woman be killed at point blank range in front of people?
Terrorist people have no idea what they are doing only other that stupid people taught them. Wake up and smell the coffee!!!!!!!!
2007-02-23 06:09:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the terrorism would have happened one way or another. The cause of the terrorism is Islamist expansionism. The war in Iraq has changed the dynamics a bit, but has not changed the global conflict.
The war in Iraq has shown the Islamists that their opponents will fight back; this is a good thing. It has also taught them a lot about our style of fighting; this is to their advantage, but inevitable.
2007-02-23 05:56:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes... President Bush has created more terrorists then they were before he invaded Iraq.
Saddam had it under control..he hated the terrorists as much as anyone anywhere but now that he is gone the people of Iraq don't have any direction and they are turning into terrorist just to belong to something... it's scary but it's the fault of President Bush and his idiots...
2007-02-23 05:51:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Again another question that one can't answer because there isn't a time machine or alternative universe to look at.
Why not come up with a question that people can answer and not just something that is all conjecture and opinion.
Oh, and terrorists don't need a reason to blow things up. They will find a reason; and if you don't give them good enough reasons, they end up blowing each other up as in the case with the recent battle between Hamas and Hezbollah.
2007-02-23 05:40:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by zaphodsclone 7
·
0⤊
1⤋