Which President did the following:
1. OK'd the sale of top secret nuclear material to the People's Republic of China.
2. Ok'd the sale of top secret computer hardware/software to the People's Republic of China.
3. Told the Prime Minister of Canada, and I quote, "If it weren't for that damned Constitution, I'd grab up every gun in America."
4. Refused to give our troops, in combat, the armored support they needed because he didn't want to upset the local civilian population.
5. Let a known terrorist go free from custody, then try to kill him 2 years later to throw media attention off his latest escapade.
6. Lied before Congress, committed perjury, and had extramarital affair in the Oval office.
7. Dodged the draft, went to Russia while we were at war with an ally of theirs, and stated "I loathe the military."
Come on now, he's your golden child and could be the first man in history to be in the White House as the First Husband. He refused to reprimand Janet Reno.
2007-02-23 04:20:19 · 23 answers · asked by bigbro3006 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The God of the liberals,President Clintorus.Famed for drive by cigarings.
2007-02-23 04:25:39 · answer #1 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Wow, lets see, Rumsfeld sat on the board of a company that sold nuke materials to N Korea. Bush has refused to properly arm our troops, and knew about the conditions at Walter Reed hospital. Bush also dodge the draft, and I won't even get into all the lying he's done that has cost us over 3,000 American lives. Guess you got me on China. Care to show proof of Clinton saying that to the Prime Minister of Canada?
2007-02-23 04:30:15 · answer #2 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
all of us use propaganda. Propaganda isn't unavoidably a foul element. Propaganda isn't unavoidably fake. for example, as quickly as we clarify to people who our shape limits government, and the only thank you to ensure liberty is to cut back government, we are propagating a attitude. there is not something incorrect with this. as quickly as we element out that firearms are owned via the yank people for the objective of self-protection, to not kill people, we are countering the propaganda of people who desire to disarm us, yet this too is propaganda. So propaganda could nicely be honest, and it could serve a noble objective. Propaganda is actual in simple terms tips to exhort people to have confidence or settle for an theory. while that concept is to sell freedom, it continues to be propaganda. the undertaking is that the media declare to record the information, as though what they are reporting is independent. while is the final time you heard the media record something favorable approximately firearms? The media maintains to portray firearms by using fact the procedures of criminals and terrorists, ignoring the reality that 0.5 of the properties in the U. S. incorporate firearms. they are implying that 0.5 the families in the U. S. are criminals or terrorists. So, I advise using propaganda so long because it quite is actual, and serves the objective of freedom.
2016-12-17 17:09:14 · answer #3 · answered by andie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm conservative, but i will give it a try.
#1. No one.
#2. No one
#3. No one
#4. Bush. There are still brigades on Iraq without the proper equip.
#5. I know bush let BinLaden go, then pulled 95% of the troops from Afganastan.
#6. Clinton
#7. The only president i know that refused to serve his country was bush, and to this day, no one has been able to prove they served with him when he was supposed to be in the guard.
Question for you. Which president IGNORED his generals when invading a middle eastern country, and the resulting lack of proper numbers plunged the country into civil war?
Which president cherry picked intel to justify a war, and then had every single reason given for war turn out to be untrue?
2007-02-23 04:28:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
You took all that time to research your "facts" (which some are just ridiculous and insane) on "blame clinton for everything" blogs and turn on your computer and link to this yahoo page and regurgitate it by typing and typing it all out knowing that your side will completely cream themselves and comment in ways that you have already imagined in the fantasy realm of your brain... and the other side will say things that you already expect and disagree with and all of your on-line buddies will slap their knees and say "oh those LIBS! hooo-eeeee! we sure zinged them this time!!!!! no one can agree with LIBS now!!!!"
I wish I was as smart as you!!!!!
2007-02-23 05:07:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Millard Fillmore?
2007-02-23 04:31:04 · answer #6 · answered by charlie_the_carpenter 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You forgot he also claimed to be the first "Black President". Dems are still obsessed with him. So much so, that they think his wife is worthy of a nomination which she doesn't deserve. Maybe Tipper can run also.
2007-02-23 04:30:25 · answer #7 · answered by mbush40 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you print out your list of questions and put the list in a centrifuge you MIGHT get more spin. Some of is just accusations made up years ago and perpetuated on right wing radio and blogs.
2007-02-23 04:25:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
You need to do more than spew accusations. #1 is unverified. You need to document them. I consider #3 apocryphal. #4 is false. I consider #5 a right-wing delusion. As for #7 he did NOT say, "I despise the military." He despised the Vietnam War, as any sensible person would.
2007-02-23 04:26:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Can I answer? I am a Republican but I know the answer! Can I?
Bill Clinton! He did it!
Chances are, poor Vince Fostor died at his hands, as well.
2007-02-23 04:26:24 · answer #10 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋