When did you find out 911 was an inside job ??

Question

That Bush went AWOL when he was in the service? That Bush lied about Saddam's WMD?

Answer 1

As soon as I saw the footage of towers 1, 2, and 7 coming down.

I was an explosive and implosive demolition contractor for 12 years. I also did site remediation (tearing down damaged buildings) during the same time. Also, I am a certified sturctural steel welder. I KNOW how buildings go up and come down.

Those buildings were pulled, dropped, blown, use whatever term you like for controlled demolition, people.

A flammable hydrocarbon such as jet-A burns under optimal conditions (with air forced into the combustion chamber) at 1,800F. In an open air fire it will burn at about 1,200F. Structural steel doesn't melt until 3,332F. Video footage shows molten steel pouring out of the gaping wound in one of the towers. Statements, recorded on video by the Naudet brothers' documentary, of firefighters on the scene that day talked about "molten steel running down the channel rails" and how it was "like being in a foundry". Sturctural steel CAN NOT be melted by a hydrocarbon. Period.

Building 7 fell perfectly into its own footprint in about 6 seconds (free-fall speed according to Newton's 2nd Law). It was hit by debris and had fires on floors 7 and 12 only. Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the WTC complex stated on the record that he had taken the decision, after talking to a fire department representative, "to pull it". That means demolish, people. It takes WEEKS of preparation, planning, and work to pull a building. You CAN'T place demolition explosives into a burning building. And yet, at about 5:30pm on 11 Sep 01, building 7 fell in a PERFECT demolition profile. Even if you want to suck your thumb and just accept that what you are being told about 9/11 is true, HOW do you possibly explain the failure of building 7? The "9/11 Commission Report" doesn't even TRY to explain the failure of building 7.

Buildings 1 and 2 fell at nearly free-fall speed. "Pancake collapses" CAN'T collapse (it's physically impossible) any faster than a rate of 6 floors per second. (A far more frequent rate of pancake collapse is 2.3 floors per second, but let's ignore that and go with the fastest possible numbers.) The towers were 110 stories tall. That would mean that the collapses should have taken at least 18.3 seconds. Tower 2 collapsed in 8.6 seconds. Tower 1 collapsed in 10.4 seconds. Ladies and gentlemen, that speed is physically impossible without demolition charges to assist the rate of destruction of sturctural integrity. Controlled demolition occurs at near free-fall speed. Pancake collapses don't.

Don't be a sucker, check me out. Take about 5 minutes of your internet surfing time and see if I'm saying anything that isn't absolutely scientifically provable. The "official story" about 9/11 is NOT scientifically provable.

Incidentally, if you want a place to start checking me, go look up a paper by Dr. Steven Jones of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Brigham Young University called "Why Indeed Did the WTC Building Collapse?"

Answer 2

Inside Job - propaganda probably instigated by the same people who have nothing better to do than make up stories like the holocaust didn't happen. By the way - Clinton was a draft dodger and lied about a lot of things as did just about every president and politician. Ever check out JFKs record? Saddam should have been taken down after the Gulf War but he was just let go; like didn't anyone in the world's governments think he may just go back to doing what he did before? Whether Bush lied or not still got Saddam out of the picture. Too bad it didn't take care of Osama at the same time.

Answer 3

Bush is good, Bush is great, Left Wing Wack Jobs have sealed their fate.
Losers sore they are for shore. But don't despair just to be fair it might just be from Mercury Poison.
If its not must be the pot or something else they take a lot.
Abducted Humm it just could be, Aliens they seem to be.
However if there not it must be a foreign plot. Iranians posing as left wing whack jobs are really doing a bang up job.
The End

Answer 4

Of course 9/11 was an inside job. You can't fly one of those jets from the outside!!

As to your other two questions: There's no mention of being AWOL in Bush's service records. According to military records...didn't happen. Please provide a link to ANY instance where Bush lied about Iraqi WMDs. Everyone alludes to it, but never cite it. Why is that?

Answer 5

THose are 3 different questions with 3 different answers


9/11? NOt an inside job
There is no record of Bush copmleting his service
Bush did lie about WMD

Answer 6

Nobody has "found out" that 9/11 was an inside job.

There is absolutely not a bit of concrete evidence that substantiates that claim.

All the evidence indicates that muslim extremists did the job.

Answer 7

I'm still waiting on some proof that 911 was an inside job....

Answer 8

I sensed it from day one. Where was the air response from our mighty military? Why did WTC7 fall?

Answer 9

here in the real world its reasonably impossible to cover up something that big and keep that many mouths quiet.

here's a tip, don't get your news from MTV and stephen colbert.

Answer 10

The same day I found out that Bill "did not have sexual relations with that woman"