So... the deadline against Iran has passed... the UN threatens sanctions.. big deal. This is a good excuse for Bush to go after Iran.. I'm sure he would like one more so called notch on his holster before leaving office.
Do you think he will invade.. or by some miracle has he learned his lesson?
Problem is.. has his fiasco in Iraq now made Iran less afraid of the U.S. than ever before????
2007-02-23 03:13:57 · 9 answers · asked by Debra H 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That would sure improve the travesty wouldn't it. The blind leading the blind....my goodness....The British and Denmark troops are leaving. This should allow the blind to see that there is no more coalition help anymore. The current Civil War and waist for a Iraq puppet Government isn't working for G.W....Bush failed to employ any diplomacy because he isn't a good President. Nobody is waiting around on Bush anymore.
2007-02-23 03:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by Mortica 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem is you base all of your thinking on what has been shown by the media. We know they are so liberal and they only want us to see one side of anything (usually the left). Saddam did have WMD but they were moved into Syria before the invasion but the media failed to mention it. And by the way, who do you think, is providing all of the ammo and men to keep the fight going in Iraq? Could it be Syria, Iran or any other country that supports terrorism? It's time America wakes up and looks beyond the media to see the truth.
2007-02-23 11:26:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Probably the next president will go after Iran. Once the get into office and they are briefed they will all do the same thing.
2007-02-23 11:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by Gustav 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have two small boys ages 3 and 6. I respect what Bush did in Iraq, now my children won't have to deal with a deranged middle eastern leader who actively sought nuclear weapons. If we go after the new centrifuges being built in Iran (something the UN has warned them not to do and something Iran has claimed they wouldn't do) by bombing them (invasion is unlikely) I'm all for it. At least Bush, unlike some of his democratic detractors, has the guts to go after countries that would use their weapons against Israel or even the US. I'm glad the president is looking after my children's future. You should thank him.
2007-02-23 11:22:11 · answer #4 · answered by Scott B 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Using the numbers from the links below, there is less than a half of a percent more per capita killings of Iraqis in Iraq than black people in the US (.020 for blacks vs. .056 for Iraqis). Would you describe the US as hosting a 'fiasco?'
2007-02-23 11:45:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
President George W. Bush is an Honorable, Christian Man. He has lead this Country unwaveringly and I trust, and Admire him.
I hope he Bombs Iran into The Stone Age !
2007-02-23 11:31:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The deadline passed Iran just like it did with Iraq, and the UN will give more sactions, just like Iraq, but we won't to war in Iran unless Congress ok's it, Just Like Iraq (besides Israel will take care of them). What fiasco? The changes that have taken place in Iraq have been breath taking. Try reaseaching what has taken place there instead of watching CNN. The only reason Iran isn't afraid of us is because the Democrat party emboldens them and they know it and exploit it. Get your head out of the sand!
2007-02-23 11:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
He will not invade Iran, as it would lead to a revolt of monumental proportions at home.
2007-02-23 11:18:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
BOMB, BOMB, BOMB
What lesson? We toppled Saddam's regime in less than a week.
2007-02-23 11:17:39 · answer #9 · answered by Hillary_Lost_To_Monica 1 · 5⤊ 3⤋