What do you think of the loose change conspiracy?

Question

about 9/11

Answer 1

It has some truth in it!

Answer 2

Personally, I believe a few of things that I saw in the video. Although the whole video may have been falsified, there is no evidence to prove the video is false. On the other hand, there is no evidence to prove that it may actually be true. They are just theories; however, I it is not necessarily a conspiracy - that may end up being true.
I'm not taking anyone's sides; the video does bring up a few interesting points, but like I said, they can't really prove any of that. Well, other than the Pentagon theory - I do believe most of that. Just search for Pentagon pictures from 9/11, and what they say in the video may in fact be true so a certain extend - I don't think it was a bomb that exploded. I do think it was a smaller plane though, not a Boeing. Everyone believe what they want to believe; we may never find out the actual story behind 9/11. The people that made the video had their theories.
I do agree with the overall message though - don't always trust what you see on TV.

Answer 3

I assume you refer to 911 loose change... I found it quite impressive when I first watched it, but on exploring the 911 truth thing I found more weirdoes, psychos, bigots, and egomaniacs than I could shake a stick at. I believe in a LIHOP (let It Happen on Purpose) scenario at minimum, but I find the whole 911 conspiracy scene too confusing and acrimonious to involve myself with, even as an observer. Pity, because we really need to find out what actually happened that day.

Hey, Freakzilla, I don't know if Bin Laden is a genius, but he can probably spell genius.

Hey, Chickyboom: Isn't "Al Qaesa" "the cheese" in mispelled Spanish? LOL

Answer 4

I have never watched the whole thing, from what I have seen though it seems highly ridiculous. That being said I still believe our government was behind 9-11, but not in the big elaborate way they think.

Answer 5

i love a good conspiracy theory but sometimes loose change seems to be reaching. and they often contradict themselves. the important thing is that it gets people to thinking and talking. the bad thing about them is that they help to drive a wedge in between the various factions in america. debate is guaranteed in america but ultimately we need consensus. (more or less).

Answer 6

I find that some of those people prefer a lollipop world where terrorism doesn't exist. These same folks believed Clinton though when he stated Al-Qaesa was to blame. It's partisan politics with most conspiracy theorists.

Answer 7

Read Nelson DeMille's new book 'Wild Fire' for a take on how the US might (I repeat, might) create an exuse to deal with terror. Of course, the word should be terrorism not terror but then, that might be too long a word for some.

Answer 8

This is a comprehensive refutation of all the half truths that were put out by this poorly researched piece of junk journalism.

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html

And while we are on the topic, I wish one of these super intelligent conspiracy theorists would explain to this poor dumb blonde this. We are told there were no pieces of aircraft wreckage at the sites, we are also told the engine pieces were the wrong type. If there was NO wreckage, how could it be the WRONG type?

Answer 9

It's like all other conspiracies. It's something to think about. You will never know.

Answer 10

The World Trade Center was blown up!

Acouple of planes could not have done that.

Check for WTC7, a plane did not even hit it. It fell at arounf 5:30 p.m. of the same day.
Check www.whatreallyhappened.com

And it wasn't just 2 buildings, it was like 6. (Someone correct me if it was more or less...) We have videos of 3, the two most famous, and WTC7.

We are being lied to!!!

Answer 11

Is that the one that says all these conspiracy theorists don't have a full dollar upstairs?