This man, hand in hand with Israel, thrills at the use of cluster bombs.
2007-02-23 01:37:05 · 4 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The main problem is that cluster bombs are designed to kill civilains.
2007-02-23 01:45:37 · update #1
He's not the only one...I love the smell of napalm in the morning!
2007-02-23 01:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
nope.
No nation that poses a threat to the security of the world is going to sign that treaty. Why should the nation tasked with upholding the security of the world be a party to something its enemies won't be?
2007-02-23 09:48:15 · answer #2 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and is worthless ban anyways.
Just like land mines.
Clinton didn't sign on to the ban.
This idea of feel good treaties won't last before the ink is dry.
Once war does break out those countries who sign on will ingore it.
2007-02-23 09:41:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
WAR IS HELL. THE BETTER THE WEAPONS THE FASTER YOU DESTROY THE ENEMY. YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT. I'M SURPRISED THAT YOU'RE A VET.
2007-02-23 09:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋