2007-02-23 01:23:19 · 9 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Too bloody much if you ask me (and I believe you did ask me). This creep siphons off every shred of dignity we Americans have and he has the nerve to demand security? Well, don't get me started (and I believe you did get me started).
2007-02-23 01:27:47 · answer #1 · answered by dank_vile 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The short answer is ALOT! But it's irrelevant since from the time that a person is elected to national office until the day they die they are afforded a certain level of Secret Service protection, even Hillary will get that protection even though she is totally opposed to the concept of the little people being able to protect their families in their own homes. I always have found that hilarious,right now Chelsea's homely butt is walking around with 24 hour armed protection but if someone tries to pass a law which would reinforce the right of people to protect themselves and their families she will oppose it. After all when Congress was looking at a law to keep police from seizing weapons from law abiding citizens in emergency situations,as the police did in New Orleans after Katrina she opposed it. But then again those weapons were only meant to protect the little people when the govt couldn't or wouldn't so why should she care,as long as she and Chelsea are safe all is good.
AD
2007-02-23 09:35:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
If you checked your history you would find that right wing leaders never get assassinated though many have tried. It's only the intelligent that get killed. Therefore Bush could walk around without security with the knowledge that the worst that could happen to him would be a minor flesh wound. That would even raise his popularity but he's too dumb to have ever read history.
2007-02-23 09:32:27 · answer #3 · answered by Watcher 465 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Protecting the "head" of the state doesn't have to do with the person itself but with the role that person represents for the country!
2007-02-23 09:30:55 · answer #4 · answered by filip 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
30% of my paycheck goes to taxes to pay for stuff like that, and that war in Iraq as well.
2007-02-23 09:26:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
We have to pay whatever it takes, of course. That's the law. But why aren't our congressfolk impeaching him?
I'm curious, are his free speech zones not working anymore? Also, curious, where do you hear this riot information - links please.
2007-02-23 09:26:17 · answer #6 · answered by cassandra 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Once again, an example of how the lunatic leftist liberals are sucking the life and money out of our country. They protest and cause problems and the rest of us have to pay for it.
2007-02-23 09:29:12 · answer #7 · answered by bkc99xx 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
WHAT RIOTS? PROVE IT. I HAVE HEARD OF NO RIOTS . THE NEWS WOULD BE ALL OVER THAT. SO WHERE WERE THESE RIOTS?
2007-02-23 09:35:03 · answer #8 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
ALOT!!!
2007-02-23 09:28:42 · answer #9 · answered by Annie 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋