I disagree, its totally against what the ECW stood for. It wasn't about fame or notoriety. It was about a bunch of selfless guys trying to entertain their loyal fan base the best they could. I'm sure most of the originals would be against it.
Plus, since the ECW is owned by the WWE now, any deserving to be in the hall of fame would just be inducted into the WWE hall. The only candidate for that right now is RVD and that might be a longshot due to all the heat he has recieved recently form the WWE management.
2007-02-23 00:43:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by LegendKiller44 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disagree. If their original arena was a bingo hall, than, how could they afford an entire HALL? Try "Broom Closet" of Fame. But, I would agree that ECW should get a wing or section of the WWE Hall of Fame.
2007-02-23 01:41:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It hadn't been going long enough to have meritted a Hall of Fame and there's no point having a Hall of Fame for a defunct organisation.
Also, Terry Funk was in the WWF & WCW before ECW.
2007-02-23 00:41:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by epbr123 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its to early to have a ECW hall of fame.Superstars like the dudleys and new jack havnt been in ECW for very long.They need to be in it for like 10 or 11 years
2007-02-23 01:16:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by timothy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agree
2007-03-02 14:36:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeffhardys#1fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disagree. Terry Funk, Rob Van Dam, and Joey Styles will probably all be inducted to the WWE hall of fame. The rest of those crappy wrestlers don't deserve it.
2007-02-23 01:18:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kris A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should put ecw people in the wwe hall of fame.
2007-03-02 14:30:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by aj121994 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you forgot the hart and soul of ECW, Tommy Dreamer. The guy that carried for for a while, Shane Douglas. The guy that started it all (sort of), Paul Heyman. And one of the few guys that was there for its entire run, Taz. I'd also put Cactus Jack into it and take New Jack out.
2007-02-23 08:00:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Prime Time™©® 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
quickly Jackson would be yelling for those damn whippersnappers to get off his backyard. Eh; in many cases, it fairly is Reggie!, and his mouth has under no circumstances been properly-supported by potential of thinking applications. yet he's giving a sterling occasion of why the collective HOFers have been a completely depressing voters whilst they have been tasked with ballots 3 or 4 cases final decade. being waiting to play great does not rapidly translate into being waiting to evaluate from the place that great enjoying got here (Joe Morgan additionally shown this each and each time he introduced a game; the guy had no coherent notions of what it replaced into he did so properly, to the factor he replaced into inadvertently denouncing his very own enjoying skills in others). i do no longer evaluate Puckett or Rice incredibly reliable options, yet they are defensible ones. and that i understand why some human beings desire to offload on Sutton. Carter replaced into the pre-eminent catcher of his era, and belongs. Niekro could be incredibly comped to Carlton in terms of what they have been given performed on the mound; honestly belongs. And Bert? Bert ought to have been in years in the past and incredibly belongs -- and that's a snigger to work out what Jackson did against Blyleven: in one hundred forty PA (the batter Bert confronted the main) he controlled to submit a triple shrink of .214 / .264 / .397 with 40 9 strikeouts. intense-high quality going, Reg, incredibly went as much as hall Of repute snuff there. for further entertainment, Jackson is going directly to declare that Morris replaced right into a extra effectual pitcher than Blyleven, including the final whiff of cinders to this smoking crater of a press release. word that %. and the youngster are not around to guard themselves, ought to they have wanted to. right this is hoping the different adult men in simple terms snub Jackson on the ceremonies. fairly, they do no longer might desire to care, through fact their plaques are forever.
2016-10-16 07:46:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agree.
2007-03-02 11:02:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Queen of Everything 3
·
0⤊
0⤋