I believe he was simply stating that all politicians lie but the clintons do it with such ease!!!!!!!!
2007-02-23 00:53:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ole David can read the handwriting on the wall. He knows that the Clintons have too many political liabilities and he is ditching them for someone that he thinks has a better chance. Obama COULD be one of those unknowns that make a big hit. Like, you know, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.
2007-02-23 08:04:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, he is just backing another left wing liberal. Even they understand that Hillary has too much baggage to be of any use. Her whole administration would be locked down just as her partner in crime Bill. I guess Bill should have pardons Geffen's criminal friend instead of the terrorist supporters he did.
2007-02-23 08:02:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Liberal NOT lieberal . That is boy Bush's appellation
Hillary NOT Hillery.
Difficult to respond to questions with glaring ungrammatical language. There's a child that was definitely left behind!
2007-02-23 08:01:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think it's funny how so many on the right complain about a left wing media conspiracy but then ridicule Hillary for talking about a right wing conspiracy.
2007-02-23 08:02:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, he just realizes that Hillary getting the nomination would be the best thing in the world for the Republicans.
2007-02-23 08:00:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No idea whom this person is, but Hillery is not electable.
2007-02-23 08:00:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by planksheer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
That comment came from what is supposed to be the smartest Dem.
Very sad.
2007-02-23 08:02:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by tip zz 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
LIBERALS ARE IN MOURNING. It's like this has been their death blow already.
Oh, excuse me, I meant "lieberals."
2007-02-23 07:59:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋