English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Evacuated tubes collectors work better in the haze but cost much more. Flat plate collectors are cheaper and work as well in full sunlight.

2007-02-23 00:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by enord 5 · 0 0

Hi friend, in my opinion, the evacuated tube solar collector is better than the flat plate solar collector, because the flat plat solar collector is difficult to repair when it was broken, but solar vacuum tube solar collector is easy to repair, only need to change one solar evacuated tube. and the flat plate solar collector is easy to be corrossion. www.himinsun.com

2016-01-05 17:25:16 · answer #2 · answered by Keitha 2 · 0 0

i don't think of there's a "suitable" answer; the climate are a million) tubes are extra effective, yet fee lots extra. The decrease performance of panels isn't unavoidably a issue, by using fact the sunlight is efficiently infinite, so which you would be able to post extra panels (till you have limited area). so which you would be able to understand the particular expenses of each and every while in comparison with the quantity of water they warmth; this varies with providers - yet in lots of situations, tubes would be extra much less costly. 2) how robust they are. Tubes could nicely be slightly fragile, the place as you are able to frequently leap on a panel without damaging it. So are you likely to get anybody throwing rocks? 3) how obtainable they are; tubes can get very (very) warm - you do not % infants or animals touching them.

2016-12-17 16:58:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Solar Power Design Manual - http://SolarPower.siopu.com/?Lov

2017-04-04 06:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I personally agrees the second floor's opinion.

2016-01-25 11:45:12 · answer #5 · answered by Zhang 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers