have you ever heard a cover song better then the origional there are few good ones out there i think but mostly the origionals are better.
2007-02-22 23:19:18 · 18 answers · asked by Tonks 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I usually like the originals better too, but sometimes the covers just have such a nice style and sound to them, that i would have to say that i like both versions. =)
2007-02-22 23:23:17 · answer #1 · answered by Jaded 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a million. For the most area, i do unlike them. and that i have heard covers that were outstanding, yet very few have exceeded the unique, in my opinion. i'd say that about ninety seven% of the time i love the unique extra appropriate. 2. i trust that a band can cover a fine looking music and nevertheless sound happy with it, yet all the covers I absolutely have heard of astounding songs in simple terms light a lot in evaluation. So, i imagine they're regularly tried, yet i imagine that it will be very confusing to make a reliable cover of a fine looking music. actually everyone will be comparing it to the unique. 3. I favor that they placed an entire new spin on it. I advise, if i go with to hearken to at least some thing that appears like the unique, i'd besides in simple terms pass pay interest to the unique. i go with to hearken to a diverse take on the music if i am going to pay interest to a cover. i go with to hearken to at least some thing new. i do no longer unavoidably imagine that it really is the in effortless words way it is going to probable be performed, yet i locate it appropriate...
2016-12-04 20:17:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, the word is 'original' - o-r-i-g-i-n-a-l-s!
Cover versions are a hit and miss group of songs.
Some do not add anything to the original, some bands do the cover song in their style, and a few go beyond the limits of the original. For a good example of doing the song in their own style, see The Dickies cover of 'Nights in White Satin'.
2007-02-22 23:57:13 · answer #3 · answered by WMD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unchained Melody by the Righteous Brothers is actually a cover and far better than the original - the first version was by Al Hibbler in 1955.
2007-02-22 23:36:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joe Cocker's I get By With a Little Help From My Friends comes to mind.
2007-02-22 23:24:24 · answer #5 · answered by Crash 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sinead O'Conner's version of Sacrifice was better.
Elton John had ruined his voice by the time he recorded it, but I think Sinead would have won hands down anyway.
Still, Elton & Bernie wrote it so I guess they don't feel too bad.
2007-02-22 23:34:53 · answer #6 · answered by Simon D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I prefer A-Ha's version of "Crying in the Rain" to the Everley (sp?)Brothers' original.
2007-02-23 04:14:13 · answer #7 · answered by chip2001 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nine Inch Nails' cover of "Metal"
Marilyn Manson's cover of "Personal Jesus"
2007-02-22 23:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by fiVe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah sure, many covers are much better that the original tracks
take for example some marilyn manson/ new found glory/ atreyu/ deadsy covers and much more...
2007-02-22 23:24:47 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jeff Buckley's cover of Hallelujah in my opinion is better but thats probably just because i like Jeff Buckley.
2007-02-22 23:22:41 · answer #10 · answered by mintycakeyfroggy 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋