Its turning into hell on toast with foreign armies pulling out, local milita, risk of civil war, civilian deaths galore and a goverment struggling to cope. So...... whats the solution?
2007-02-22 22:32:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The only thing I agree with is to pull ALL foreign troops out of Iraq. I don not however agree with your reasons.
I would love to know how you would feel if another country came into America or the UK took down the government let all the criminals out of jail then manned the streets with weapons!! Are you going to tell me that your criminals would not take advantage of the lack of policing? Are you saying that you dont have murderers in your country? or is it just that they are not Muslim?
The majority of Iraqis are peaceful people and are in turmoil as they see their country and way of life being turned upside down. You cant even go out of your house after 2pm at the moment in most major cities. Do you think they want car bombs everyday?
This war was over oil and nothing else. The Iraqis know this and so do all the other Middle Eastern countries. They will take steps to protect the oil as would any other country in their situation.
the Iraqis were not prepared for a change in government and it has resulted in turmoil. Who gets to decide? Saddam was not a nice man but Iraq and its people were doing well. They felt safe.
2007-02-23 00:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by entertainer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pull our troops out and let the Sunnis and Shites have at it with their Civil War. They can wipe an astronomical amount of each other out. Remember the US Civil War. Thousands died. I just don't know of another solution other than droping a nuclear bomb on the entire country and that's not feasible. We shouldn't have been in Iraq in the first place. Afghanistan, yes. But there were no Iraqis involved in 9/11, so I can't figure out what we're doing there.
2007-03-02 05:20:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is just going to have to fight it out till the fighting burns out and some stable power structure emerges out of attrition..
That is not a solution , rather the unfortunate circumstance that has developed out of consequene.
It was the OIL and Military bases they were/are ultimately after, WMD and Alkaeda connections were used as tools of propaganda and 9/11 served to justify and bolster the propaganda . The Administration felt confident that upon seeing a rapid and outstanding success it would be easy enough to find a couple of Al Kaeda members in the general population and enough WMD bits and pieces scattered about to back up their rhetoric once they demonstrated to the world that a thriving and secure Iraq was setting an outstanding model of Democracy in the Mid East.
Considering what actually developed out of all this the only honorable course of action left is that of reconciliation, reconstruction, and repairing the public security as best we can without getting directly envolved takeing sides or trying to police and micro manage a civil war . Plans of continuing on with overt demands for Private US oil exploitation, political manipulation and usury as a Military base of operations to expand the war on into Iran and Syria have been dashed by shear ineptitude, dishonesty and deceit carried out by the Administration and further military action to secure these goals will only ensure a larger over all casualty toll with little to show for it in the end .
IMO once a reasonable level of public security is procured The most we can ask of the people of Iraq would be a reasonable guarantee that they will not engage in all the terrible untrue things we accused them of engaging in as a premise to blow their infrastructure and public security to smithereens in the first place.
2007-02-23 05:41:57 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know much of anything about war, but perhaps the best way to solve it would be to set up a strict deadline, and also show the Iraqis that America wants to help them create a peaceful country with a fair government, but if they are unwilling to cooperate, we sadly will have to pull out and allow them to sort it out on their own. America should only be guiding the people in the right direction, and if they don't want our direction, which I kind of get the feeling they don't, then perhaps the best thing to do is say bon voyage! Yet still be available to help them when they need it, without the use of weapons or warfare.
2007-02-23 01:36:15 · answer #4 · answered by Rachael N 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
problematic inquiries to answer. I hear from pals who've kinfolk over there interior the militia that say issues are starting to be extra smart in some approaches and worse in others. to pass away Iraq proper now might in some approaches be sturdy interior the fast term yet possibly no longer interior the long term. the unique objective became to eliminate Saddam which we did and then help the individuals there set up there own Democratic government. one that has unfastened elections and a sturdy shape that covers each and every person no matter what their ethnic historic past is. yet from watching the in combating between different tribes i do no longer comprehend in the event that they gets previous that adequate to stay at the same time in a unfastened society. you could lead a horse to water yet you could no longer make him drink. yet in spite of if it truly is effectual it truly is going to be a great victory for the international. we don't desire to dominate or triumph over Iraq or everywhere else in basic terms help them to be a unfastened people run by employing regulations that all of them agree on and vote for. no longer having to stay in concern of a dictator who might have you ever killed in simple terms via fact he would not like the type you walk or something. yet is their freedom in spite of if it truly is effectual going to seize on over there? Are we taking too huge a risk putting our women folk and men individuals in harms way interior the hopes that democracy and guy or woman freedom wins over terrorism? i think of we ought to win the conflict on terrorism. i'm in simple terms not sure if we are going approximately it interior the final way. Sorry yet I have no absolute solutions on your questions as I actual have an analogous ones myself. In some approaches I accept as true with Bush and on some issues I disagree. yet i think of he's an common guy doing a problematic interest in afflicted circumstances. So I pray a lot. lol
2016-12-14 03:46:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bring our troops home and let the Iraqi people sort out their own mess. They're free of the tyranny of Saddam and there are and never were WMD's. What's left to do? Spend billions more to rebuild a country that was a mess when we got there?
2007-02-22 22:43:18 · answer #6 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The U.S. should utilize MX missiles and turn iraq and iran into a parking lot.
As far as Debra_D's answer: Somehow I think the Kurds who got gassed with chemical weapons were just kidding....there really are no chemical or biological weapons. Mindless!
2007-02-22 22:56:08 · answer #7 · answered by Bryan _ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pull troops out of the cities and just have them secure the oil facilities. Take the oil for US use (as payment for the security provided) and let the rest of the country be civil or uncivil, what ever they want to do between themselves, and don't interfere.
2007-02-22 23:06:58 · answer #8 · answered by victorschool1 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
ask Iran to test their nukes on it.
2007-02-23 14:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LET TURKEY TAKE OVER MUSUL AND KERKUK
AND ALL PROBLEMS WOULD BE SOLVED :)
2007-02-22 22:47:06 · answer #10 · answered by MORTİCİA 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋