Should they qualify for parole after only 10 years?
Is this US justice?
What does this show to the rest of the world?
2007-02-22 20:06:30 · 11 answers · asked by Gent 5 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Absolutely NOT. If they are capable of this as a soldier they will still be capable of this same atrocious crime as a civilian.
THE SENTENCE WAS TOTAL INJUSTICE. We just don't need such low life's in our military.
I can't believe they get 10 years for rape and murder and our Border Patrol, doing their job, getting 40 years for nipping an illegal drug smuggler in the butt and then being immuned from punishment.
2007-02-22 22:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...but under the current sentence they are eligible for parole after 10 years.
2007-02-22 20:16:18 · answer #2 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would the rest of the world be willing to bring their soldiers and commanders forward to face a right Justice for all such crimes against humanity?and allow the people to dart questions at them without protections.?
2007-02-22 20:27:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
international conflict crimes are for while the warriors homestead us of a refuses to prosecute. The soldier replaced into tried in usa via individuals and convicted of rape, homicide. He probable will receive the penalty of death it quite is a lot extra severe then he could get in the international court docket. What may be the component to a international conflict crime trial? it quite is to undesirable you're anti-American and anti-militia yet, our justice equipment works in simple terms nice thank you.
2016-12-17 16:55:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes of course. The "murder" issue is totally erroneous. How can you commit murder in a war environment?! Its ludicrous! As far as rape goes especially in a country where camels cringe at the sights of their masters, at least the US has "standards."
2007-02-22 21:01:38 · answer #5 · answered by cellguy38019 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
soldier or civilian neither should get parole for these crimes, throw them to general population.
2007-02-22 20:11:27 · answer #6 · answered by mean evil woman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
".....And you judges who would be just,
What judgment pronounce you upon him who though honest in the flesh yet is a thief in spirit?
What penalty lay you upon him who slays in the flesh yet is himself slain in the spirit?
And how prosecute you him who in action is a deceiver and an oppressor,
Yet who also is aggrieved and outraged?
And how shall you punish those whose remorse is already greater than their misdeeds?
Is not remorse the justice which is administered by that very law which you would fain serve?
Yet you cannot lay remorse upon the innocent nor lift it from the heart of the guilty.
Unbidden shall it call in the night, that men may wake and gaze upon themselves.
And you who would understand justice, how shall you unless you look upon all deeds in the fullness of light?
Only then shall you know that the erect and the fallen are but one man standing in twilight between the night of his pygmy-self and the day of his god-self,
And that the corner-stone of the temple is not higher than the lowest stone in its foundation."
2007-02-22 23:06:05 · answer #7 · answered by erlish 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, because they have committed their lives, however dishonorably, to make the world adhere to American standards.
2007-02-22 20:20:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if they commit a crime they should be treated the same as everyone else.
2007-02-22 20:19:37 · answer #9 · answered by hhutchie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. I mean c'mon, seriously?
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!!....or hang/inject them.
2007-02-23 00:38:41 · answer #10 · answered by Speedjak 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋