As long as you're the recipient?
2007-02-22 19:47:37 · 8 answers · asked by busted.mike 4 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I was opened to it, but after much deliberation, the case is now closed.
It is a great obligation to void oneself of expectation...no matter how slight. To do so, blurs the line between human and “zombie”. My conditions for exchange are based on my values—this is a good thing. For if based on nothing...I really don't give a ham.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
2007-02-23 06:56:57 · answer #1 · answered by LUCKY3 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't want to be the recipient of unconditional giving.
I would rather be the giver of unconditional love.
2007-02-23 03:55:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most often the quality of substance being given has been of such a standard that the recipient would find hardly much use for it and then pass it along or discard of it.
2007-02-23 04:42:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is giving unconditional love, yes---- with this kind of love you can endure the ups and down of the situation you are in.
2007-02-23 03:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by kibbs 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have a lot of bad Karma from my past
lives so I'm for unconditional giving.
I have to make up for all that bad Karma.
2007-02-23 04:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by popo dean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
always open to it
no other way to save our souls
only unconditional giving is the key to ourselves
2007-02-23 05:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by Helen from Greece 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
then it is called love and only love
you should have not disclosed your position in such a situation
i have sypathy for the giver
2007-02-23 05:22:38 · answer #7 · answered by Caring 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there isn't enough charm to seduce the life spawn of the other
2007-02-23 04:18:19 · answer #8 · answered by bev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋