prove that 100-100/100-100 = 2 ?????

Question

It is true, I can prove it but can you ???

Answer 1

Solution :-
100-100/100-100 = 2
100-100 = 2(100+100)
100-100 = 400
400/100+100
400/200
2

Answer 2

Following rules of math (order of operations), the dividing 100's would go first (1) so it would be 100-1-100 so the answer would end up being -1

Answer 3

yes it is true
100-100/100-100=0/0

but 0/0 is not defined.
you take 0x1=0
you take 0x2=0

If you take 0x2 then it becomes true

otherwise this may be the solution
100-100/100-100=2
1/1=2
1=2x1
1=2
=2/1=2.

One of these must be true

Answer 4

the way u've written it its:

= 100 - 100/100 - 100
= 100 - 1 - 100
= -1

lets see yr ans IM it to me at vedant1811

Answer 5

This is just a theory
100-100/100-100
Both 100's will get cancelled
- and - will get cancelled
- and - = +
so,
1+1=2
(mail me at [e-mail] if it is correct)

Answer 6

Provided 1 = 2.
You can't change Mathematics basics.
This equation may not be clearly written that manner you obviously can prove.
May be a child's play.

Answer 7

you could no longer practice it, except you initiate making mind-blowing assumptions. I, case in point, ought to anticipate that 0=a million. Then one hundred-one hundred = 0, that's its own reciprocal via fact 0*0=0=a million (by employing my loopy-*** assumption, required to coach a loopy-*** result). So (one hundred - one hundred)/(one hundred - one hundred) = 0*a million/(one hundred - one hundred) = 0*0 = 0 = 0 + 0 = a million + a million = 2. below hardship-free arithmetic, it may't be shown via fact it truly is faulty. Ah, I see wukles has the belief. it truly is adorable. it remains incorrect, of path, via fact it truly is in actuality asserting that (10 - 10)/(10 - 10) = a million, which (a million) divides by employing 0, and (2) is predicated on an analogous concept that declares (one hundred - one hundred)/(one hundred - one hundred) = a million. yet you're employing it to coach (one hundred - one hundred)/(one hundred - one hundred) = 2. Getting distinctive solutions from distinctive algebraic manipulations in simple terms shows that it truly is an expression for which algebra can no longer supply a relentless answer if we anticipate that the integers are distinctive. To Liars never lies: Your info isn't precisely ultimate, the two, via fact it has the hidden assumption that "undefined" is comparable to "equivalent to in spite of the heck i desire it to be". as a question of fact, that there is not any admissible info for the above fact, via fact it truly is incorrect. The asker in simple terms approximately easily conscious that it truly is faulty, and became looking forward to a trick like the single wukles wrote out. it truly is extra of a game than actual math.

Answer 8

No I am not able to prove it. I am very keen to know the answer . Please mail me the right answer at

[e-mail]

Waiting 4 ur answer

Answer 9

Dear i think this is game like 2x2=5, i can prove this, u can..... nothing is impossible in this world...please email me ur correct [e-mail] thanks!

Answer 10

you wish you could prove it.