I mean it is not as though Anna deserves tears. She did nothing but sponge off others use people and trick people. To top it off she was a druggie with a bad family. Why the tears judge?
2007-02-22 17:04:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
nothing wrong with crying when appropriate. But this situation requires no tears unless you knew the person. And nobody cared enough about this woman to not enable her to use these drugs.
2007-02-22 17:09:43 · update #1
Prickle, I am a better person than that judge. I would not have sent the body to the Bahamas. I would have chewed Sterns butt out and told him that he was a creep. I think he murdered both the son and mother. I would have told him to bring the baby back to the US like a man and give it to Larry. I am very sympathetic this judge certanley was not.
2007-02-22 17:21:25 · update #2
It was a pathetic display on his part. The trial was about him not the issue at hand. How did this moron ever get through law school and get on the bench is beyond me.
2007-02-22 22:36:36 · answer #1 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For once the judge visualized humanness going on. Greed. Yes, when someone dies family gets together to fight where she is to be buried? Who gets the child. Anna was a lost cause and we got see why. Review all the calamity after Anna died. We hear it everyday. Why is this more important than other news? Because the media again makes it important. Most people stayed around TVs watching the trial. And they wonder why men like sports? There sure was some good college games on. All I could to for the family was pray HIS will be done. Maybe; just maybe the judge felt this presence and tried his best to do what most would call God's Will.
2007-02-23 01:23:56 · answer #2 · answered by B O B Bob 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the tears were for Anna but for the orphaned, semi-famous child left behind, under his custody! This little girl has no family left for her- just a lawyer! How pathetic is that? I would cry too!
2007-02-23 01:14:55 · answer #3 · answered by canguroargentino 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you people serious? It's inappropriate for a judge to cry in court, especially over this case. A judge is supposed to be sober and serious. You want everyone to be Dr. Phil or Oprah. Cry me a river.
2007-02-23 01:26:27 · answer #4 · answered by JD 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shame on you. The judge was a remarkably empathetic and caring individual for whom the facts of this case weighed heavily. Gee, you sound very judgemental. If you really want to make this world a better place, I suggest that you change your attitude.
2007-02-23 01:17:16 · answer #5 · answered by compaq presario 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's a ham. He was hamming it up for the cameras. He wants to be the next Oprah or Judge Judy.
LOL!! You would have chewed his butt out? You might want to rephrase that one.
2007-02-23 01:07:12 · answer #6 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because he just went thru 6 days of hearings with no result
2007-02-23 01:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by achronicfan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yo forserious, im scared of someone who doesnt cry.
2007-02-23 01:07:23 · answer #8 · answered by stakchipz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋