Does anyone agree that Hillary will attract the most votes from Republicans as a Democrat Candidate?

Question

I mean its a known fact she collaborates with Bush and vocally supported him during his war efforts until recently. She has vowed to continue what Bush started - that is form allies around the world and go after more nations like Iran. If you were a Republican, would you agree with Hillary's foreign policy?

If you disagree, who do you think will attract more Republican votes from among the Democrat Candidates?

Answer 1

Yes, she will attract large sums of money from the very interests that have us bogged down in Iraq right now.
Before anyone thumbs me down...do some research on her backers and see if you draw the same conclusions has me.
"Hilliary is DLC. DLC ties to PNAC:
Who is Will Marshall?

Will Marshall is one of the founders of the New Democrat movement, which aims to steer the US Democratic Party toward a more right-wing orientation. Since its founding in 1989, he has been president of the Progressive Policy Institute, a think tank affiliated with the Democratic Leadership Council. He recently served on the board of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, a committee chaired by Joe Lieberman and John McCain designed to build bipartisan support for the invasion of Iraq. Marshall also signed, at the outset of the war, a letter issued by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) expressing support for the invasion. Marshall signed a similar letter sent to President Bush put out by the Social Democrats USA on Feb. 25, 2003, just before the invasion. The SDUSA letter urged Bush to commit to "maintaining substantial U.S. military forces in Iraq for as long as may be required to ensure a stable, representative regime is in place and functioning." He writes frequently on political and public policy matters, especially the "Politics of Ideas" column in Blueprint, the DLC's magazine. Notably, he is one of the co-authors of Progressive Internationalism: A Democratic National Security Strategy."

Answer 2

You have not seen the negative voter reaction such as will happen if Hillary should actually win the democratic nomination, as is predicted by some political advisers.

Hillary is not as well loved nor as politically powerful as the press would have us believe. I feel fairly certain I speak for a good many people when I say, America neither needs nor wants even 5 more minutes of the keystone cops like capers of Biliary (Bill and Hillary for the more slow witted among us).

As for Barrack Obama, he is even scarier than Al Gore or Bill Clinton. This man is so liberal, I sincerely doubt America could recover from the damage he would do.

I truly believe the democrats, as well as the republicans are deeply hurting for a believable, strong candidate. For the first time in the 17 years I have been old enough to vote, I am deeply concerned for the welfare of this country and its ability to come out of these times as a free, independent and sovereign nation.

For far too long, we have allowed our leaders and our judges to so obscure and change the Constitution that we no longer have a Constitutionally governed nation. We have drifted far from our roots that were originally founded deep in the foundation of a republican form of government to a more socialistic society, that is closer to being communist than we truly realize.

Answer 3

Frankly, the Republican kind is so broken by potential of using Bush and his cronies that the Democrats might have nominated a rutabaga or an aubergine and ought to although win the White living domicile and advance their majority in the two homes of Congress. If some thing, the Democrats found out that this grew to alter into suitable right into an excellent danger to make history with the two a woman or an African American in the White living domicile. and don't sell American women human beings short! they are the biggest important block and on a similar time as some will in all hazard no longer rally hale and hearty in the lower back of lots of the extra vocal feminists, all of them have women human beings's rights intense up on their checklist of priorities. on a similar time because it fairly is achieveable that race might desire to swing the vote in McCain's desire, even bearing in mind a life like "Bradley effect" it is going to no longer be able to be adequate to worth Senator Obama the election. in fact, there are some indications and indicators of a "opposite Bradley effect" the area some white voters ought to publicly state that they does no longer vote for a Black candidate yet will vote in a diverse way in the privateness of the voting sales section. My neighbor around the line is one such achieveable voter. He has continuously peppered his outdoor and automobiles with Republican indications and indicators and stickers for the time of each election. he isn't showing a single one this 12 months and he gets VERY non-committal as quickly as you ask him how he's going to vote.

Answer 4

First of all where to you get the idea they are on the same page? You didn't hear her little tantrum how if she's president she will end Iraq and she's going to put a stop to financially supporting the war? As for a Republican voting for a Democrat ain't gonna happen!! We've got to much class for that!

Answer 5

She has not been vocally supporting George Bush for quite a long time, certainly not recently. She got hoodwinked just like most of Congress and most of us. I'm just glad she's got enough sense to change her position when she sees the first one was wrong. Strangely enough, I find that to be a sign of intelligence, versus the Bush bots who can't admit they were wrong anymore than Bush can. Her foreign policy will be NOTHING like George Bush's. She has vowed many things, but keeping Bush's status quo sure isn't one of them. She has repeatedly and very clearly talked about how he has trashed our reputation around the world and how she will work to correct that. She intends to stand side by side with our Allies instead of in front of them. And she also intends to seriously go after terrorists instead of policing a civil war. Both of them being hawks doesn't naturally lead to them being the same in foreign policy. Bush is a cowboy, she is a uniter. He's a warmonger, she's in favor of diplomacy before military action. He's arrogant in his dealings with our Allies, she treats them with the respect and due consideration they deserve. He stands in front of our Allies as though he controls them all, she intends to stand next to them in solidarity against terrorism. Big, big political idealogical differences between George Bush and Hillary Clinton.

Despite their political differences, I think she will garner more Republican votes than most would believe. I know she's got my stepmother's attention - a retired Army Major who's never voted Democratic in her life. In her reelection she attracted the majority of the vote in Upper New York State, traditionally a Republican stronghold.

Answer 6

I think that the people who say they want Giuliani need to consider the political differences between him and Hillary. She may be more conservative than he is. And I think if it comes down to Hillary and Giuliani, I may switch my vote to Hillary. If we are going to have a liberal in the Whitehouse, it should be a Democrat.

Answer 7

No, she is now against the war and did not 'admit' that she was for the war and made the same reasons why we should toppled Saddam Husein when Bill Clinton was president.

Her politics is poll-driven, just like her husband.

Answer 8

I think so and I am an Independent!! Hillary is trying to play both sides. She initially supported the war, but now is against it.

Answer 9

NO! She's lying!! hillery clinton only supports hillery clinton, exclusively over everything else! She's insanely power mad and will do or say anything to get more power. She is the Third Incarnation of the Anti-Christ!

Answer 10

NO! New Mexico Gov would though. Look at issues and what the canadates support