Which one will you hire? a Dean's List law student or an average law student?

Question

I am currently studying in my second year the second best law school in my country and never get Dean's List. however, when i asked these Dean's List student about how they study they usually memorize lecturers notes and reproduce it in exam. the more you memorize, the more your mark is. As for me, i hate memorizing but pay more attention on understanding. my logic is that, there's no point in memorizing because everything is in the book which u can refer in the future. Recently, i had a group assignment on criminal law and this one Dean's List student had no idea when i said 'Smith & Hogan' that i was referring to a criminal law book. This student relied solely on the lecturers notes and had no idea about criminal law as a whole the moment it is not within the syllabus. I am very dissappointed knowing that the only way i can get a Dean's List is by using most of my time memorizing rather than being able to really read other books thats available in the library.

Answer 1

Unfortunately, employers look at grade's first. You won't even get a certain interview if your grades aren't what they're looking for.

The sad fact is, particularly at the better law schools, what you learn in law school has almost no usefulness when actually practicing. So, you won't know how good a kid is until you try em out. With no real way to judge, you filter applicants based on grades.

Yes, in the end, the good lawyers will make it to the top no matter what their grades or school. However, getting a nice job your first time out certainly makes your career path more palatable.

Fortunately for you, you say you go to the 2nd best law school in the country. Everyone gets a nice job from those schools. You know the joke about Harvard. A students become law professors, B students become judges, C students become rich.

Also, remember that those deans list kids aren't dummies either. Can't be to get in. They may claim they just memorize lectures all day long, but they're protecting their ranking. Are you sure what they're telling you is the whole entire truth? Maybe it's just half true? Maybe it's not at all?

Answer 2

it really is likely too early for you to problem about even if you've the chops for regulation college. concentration on transferring into an excellent college. you could likely make the regulation college decision throughout your sophomore year of faculty. once you're nevertheless uncertain, you could pass ahead and take the LSAT come June after your junior year of faculty. in case you could't spoil say, a one hundred and 55, and your GPA isn't a lot extra appropriate than it really is now, then you should likely start up harboring doubts about even if you'll locate your area of interest in a regulation college.

Answer 3

I would hire the average law student. I think if you know what you are talking about or doing that is what matters. Not your marks. Just because you look good on paper doesn't mean you are going to make it out in the real world.

Answer 4

This is why there is no memorization in the top US Law schools. The exams are open book. It is all about understanding.

Answer 5

i would get the one who would make the bigger impression, i dont even care if he is a deans list or not and youre right memorizing is the lowest form of learning without analyzing, dont worry as long as you are confident, willing and hardworking you would be successful its not about a stupid list

Answer 6

Like many students you are focused on getting that first job. While your less impressive grades might make it more difficult to get that first job what really counts for your future will be how well you perform in that first job. Great job performance will make your second job anything you want it to be.

Answer 7

Employers usually depend more on an interview than grade statistics, even though the interview is the most subjective method of choosing an employee. Simply wow your interviewer with your knowledge of law and you'll be fine.