2007-02-22 16:15:10 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As a card carrying member, I would say anything with socialist, facist, or communist leanings. I also love to hate the Greens, bunch of tree hugging capitalist hating queers.
Plus I would hardly say Anarchists, more like strict constructionists of or founding documents. If the Bill of Rights can be perceived as anarchy, then you're still trapped in modern big government thought, and have no idea what the party platform is. Sam Adams summed it up well.
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
2007-02-22 16:26:07 · answer #1 · answered by Tucson Hooligan 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The opposite of libertarian would be whoever runs the America Media Machine.
2007-02-23 00:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by jasonpickles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, libertarians are generally anarchists, so I guess the American Nazi party would be the exact opposite.
2007-02-23 00:33:11 · answer #3 · answered by Liberal Larry 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No one can argue against libertarian political position, they would have to argue against liberty. The political party is simply underfunded ans politically isolated by the media. The dominate political parties make sure they stay underfunded, ignored and unnoticed by mainstream America.
2007-02-23 00:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Possible the Green Party.
http://www.gp.org/tenkey.shtml
2007-02-23 00:46:23 · answer #5 · answered by Jamie R 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ayn Rand on Libertarians:
All kinds of people today call themselves “libertarians,” especially something calling itself the New Right, which consists of hippies, except that they’re anarchists instead of collectivists. But of course, anarchists are collectivists. Capitalism is the one system that requires absolute objective law, yet they want to combine capitalism and anarchism. That is worse than anything the New Left has proposed. It’s a mockery of philosophy and ideology. They sling slogans and try to ride on two bandwagons. They want to be hippies, but don’t want to preach collectivism, because those jobs are already taken. But anarchism is a logical outgrowth of the anti-intellectual side of collectivism. I could deal with a Marxist with a greater chance of reaching some kind of understanding, and with much greater respect. The anarchist is the scum of the intellectual world of the left, which has given them up. So the right picks up another leftist discard. That’s the Libertarian movement.
2007-02-23 00:25:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Socialist
2007-02-23 00:20:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Give the best answer to Tucson Hooligan! He nailed it!
2007-02-23 02:40:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would say a communist party in the lenin stalin sense would be opposite that.
2007-02-23 00:21:49 · answer #9 · answered by sociald 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Libertarians are just Republicans that smoke pot and want to get laid.
2007-02-23 00:18:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋