English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

because I think they are a threat, not to say bush thought he was lying about iraq, so try to leave that out. I won't lie I got this from a political cartoon.

2007-02-22 16:04:50 · 10 answers · asked by asmith1022_2006 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Oh my, I thought you would understand that this time Iran was the "wolf". Meaning it was serious.

2007-02-22 16:16:42 · update #1

ursustrader, I was refering to the current situation, and how many people do not take Iran seriously. I am only 18, but I probably have a more thourogh knowledge of History than most people, so please do not question me on that.

2007-02-22 16:44:06 · update #2

10 answers

The situation presently concerning Iran is deadly serious.
I don't believe anyone who stresses this fact is "crying wolf."
This time, I'm afraid, the "wolf" is quite real and we had better not ignore the cries.
We found out too late that the organizations and people who were sending reports of the possible impending events of 9/11 were certainly not crying wolf. We should not repeat this mistake.

2007-02-22 16:15:19 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2 0

I dont know how mant people are familiar with the free speech channel on satelite Channel 9414 I think ,they are unbiased media channel that accepts no money from govt or corperate interests ,only public donations .It really makes you see how biased and controlled our media system in America is by govt,
Tonight I was watching it and they reported some evidence has found that shows proof that Bush and Blair had a meetting to find a way to sucker or try and provoke Sadam into doing something to use as an excuse to invade Iraq .They said its proof that it was all premeditated on our part . After that they had some guy that had been some type military weapons or munitions speacialist for Iran on there, but I dont think he was Iranian
.Who said the weapons our country showed on tv and reported they were given to insurgents by Iran .Were not Iranian weapons and the U.S. lied to provoke a confrontation . Then last week I saw where terrorist blew some thing up in Iran and a couple were captured and confessed the U.S. was behind it had supplied them and set it up .I 'd really hope its not true as much as we go on about fighting terrorism .Then to find out we were behind an act of terrorism in another country. But with this corrupt government .Nothing would surpise me That would make George oily Bush a few more billion dollars .If we were committed to war in Iran long enough to steal their oil reserves too. Its pretty obvious why he didnt have a plan to get out of Iraq .He's so positive about saying (Were not going to cut and run) Not as long as those wells are pumping $ into his pockets ,No matter how many American kids get killed or how many Iraqi civillians we kill .Or how much money it cost tax payers in our country

2007-02-22 17:25:08 · answer #2 · answered by dollars2burn4u 4 · 0 1

Which time? The Boy Who Cried Wolf was correct about the threat to his sheep at least once, remember? So you could answer this yes, or no. Either answer would be correct.

2007-02-22 16:10:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

do not all of us agree we (U.S.) now have a wide problem with those organizations going bankrupt and perilous all some thing individuals? it type of feels to have the Congress, the Senate, and the Media all in a dither, so what would you assume out of our President? He extra appropriate be in touch. it will be a wolf this time. stop your criticizing, and be a reliable citizen.

2016-12-04 20:05:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Where have you been for the past 25+ years? Iran has attacked us time and time again. Are you sleeping like the rest of the west?

2007-02-22 16:40:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not to me. Anyone who doesn't see Iran as a serious threat has to be smoking something other than tobacco.

2007-02-22 16:30:18 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 0

Oh I read that book - In the ending the wolf ate the boy -

2007-02-22 16:16:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

daddy's reconstruction firms are going to have one hell of a job on their hands if they try THAT stunt. This is one pissing contest Bush had best not even think about, he's reckless even pretending the results wouldn't be disasterous for the world. More attempts at unilateral global conquest are going to end in tears.

2007-02-22 16:18:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Don't stole my ideas!
Just kidding. I've been thinking that for about a week.

2007-02-22 16:17:58 · answer #9 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 1 1

its a pity its the only story he can remember from his childhood

2007-02-22 16:10:29 · answer #10 · answered by fatdadslim 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers