English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its looking very possible, yeehaaaah! Im all or it.

2007-02-22 15:11:07 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

For those that say no, why not? Who is better?

2007-02-22 15:19:45 · update #1

20 answers

Nope.

2007-02-22 15:14:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't think Hillary should be president. Not because of her gender, but because she's a liar like most other politicians. She supported the war, then does an about-face because it's not popular. If the war were popular, you know she'd support it. She has no backbone and she flip-flops too much on issues.

Besides, we had to watch Bill's escapades for 8 years. Hillary don't need to be in office when First Lady Bill is caught with another intern under the desk.

We need a break from this 'Bush/Clinton' dynasty.

Obama is a better candidate, but his time hasn't arrived yet. Maybe in another 4-8 years.

Rudy Giulani did wonders for NYC as mayor. He cleaned it up when Ed Koch couldn't and David Dinkins sent the dity further down the crapper. He stood by his policies in spite of any criticism. The nation knows how he led the city on 9/11. This country needs to be cleaned up and Rudy is the ONLY candidate able to successfully carry this out.

All of the other candidated are frauds.

IT'S GIULANI TIME!!!

2007-02-23 02:58:34 · answer #2 · answered by Tiberius 4 · 0 0

While Hillary (I have met and conversed with her in person) is well qualified for the job of president, she will not be the first female president. There are too many cultural taboos that still exist in America about women's' ability to make hard decisions, especially military decisions (plus, there are too many men who are scared of strong capable women - I, myself, love 'em).

Ms. Clinton, however, will break down most barriers to a woman being a viable candidate paving the way for future female presidential candidates to have a somewhat fair chance at being evaluated by the voters on their merits and skills, not their sex. For this reason alone, Clinton deserves support.

2007-02-23 03:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by Greg C 3 · 0 0

John Edwards will be the next president. Hillary has 3 problems 1)she is a woman, 2)She is married to Bill and I don't know if that will help or hurt her. 3) She supported the war

Obama is the best candidate in my opinion but he has 2 bigger problems: 1) He has a Muslim name and we are at war in the middle east. 2) He is the wrong color.....say what you want but America is not ready to vote black yet.

Edwards has enough money and a good campaign and will slip in. If not just becuase he is a white man. The republicans can't win this time around even with Rudy.....

Ron Paul is my guy but he can't get any press.

2007-02-22 16:27:58 · answer #4 · answered by brooklyn 4 · 0 1

Don't get too excited...she's not even going to make it beyond the Primary.
American voters are smart enough to realize they don't need this radical, wild-eyed, flaming, crazy, feminist, power-hungry, leftist liberal whose only platform is the criticism she continuously spews about the Bush administration.
She has absolutely nothing substantive to offer in the way of a plan for the future except..."withdraw now", "cut military spending", "cut-off funding for the troops in Iraq".
If you think America is perceived as weak and ineffective now, just imagine with a Hillary sitting in the Oval Office...YIKES!
America might be ready for a woman President.
America is just not ready for a Hillary Clinton.

2007-02-22 15:19:24 · answer #5 · answered by GeneL 7 · 1 0

Probably not,b.c. she's was a woman,and women do not get enough respect.If she was elected some sexist would probably try to shoot her,sadly.Though I would love to see her to be president.Everybody knows anyone is better than Bush.If she is President Clinton's wife(he was the best Pres. ever)she's gotta be a good candidate for the President but knowing this world it'll never happen

2007-02-22 15:36:38 · answer #6 · answered by TH 3 · 0 0

In my opinion......

No....why?...the older people,those who show up to vote, know and have not forgot her legacy to date....whitewater, paper shredding,a woman sitting in prison for years to keep from testifying against the Clintons.. a few deaths...carting off part of the Whitehouse and being made to take it back....and many other wonderful things......

If this woman wins the Democrat presidential nomination...they will lose the Whitehouse again....they better concentrate on another.......

neither a donkey or elephant.......

2007-02-22 15:35:56 · answer #7 · answered by LeftField360 5 · 0 0

Oh Lordy, I hope not. Reason? Her ambition knows no bounds and her politics shift daily - depending on the polls. She has no character and I believe, is morally bankrupt.

2007-02-25 08:24:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nope - for as much support as she has USA has not progressed enough yet to vote in a woman.
You owe me coffee when it is proved that i am right.

2007-02-22 15:19:30 · answer #9 · answered by Star 3 · 0 0

What do you mean the first ??? She was alredy President , she was the one in charge when Bill was in office !!!

2007-02-22 16:26:25 · answer #10 · answered by Kit 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers