2007-02-22 14:50:02 · 9 answers · asked by ♥♥♥ 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
yes, because in all other wars we only have one side of the war. in this both sides were american so it doubled the deathc ount.
redhed
2007-02-22 14:58:11 · answer #1 · answered by redhead 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the U.S? yes it was. Out side of it no. The Vietnam war was the bloodiest war that America was ever in.
2007-02-22 22:53:54 · answer #2 · answered by sarah 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Consider this as an example.
In the 11 years we were in Vietnam we lost just over 58,000 casulties. At Gettysburg, during the Civil War, there were that many in 3 days of battle.
2007-02-22 22:59:26 · answer #3 · answered by eks_spurt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just depends on who you ask on US soil yes.. Many brothers killed each other that is why the President said a house divide can not stand.... That was a Republican too. Actually WWII did bet it over 1.5 million died in the south Pacific that was both... before the 2 atomic bombs were dropped... Over 7 million in Europe.. On D day about 4 thousand died that Day and A Democrat sent us in for that...
2007-02-22 22:54:31 · answer #4 · answered by Frank G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is the war that has resulted in the most American casualties. And that makes sense since Americans were fighting each other...lol
2007-02-22 22:53:14 · answer #5 · answered by ♥♥♥♥♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well no but the battle of Antietam was the single bloodiest day in American history with over 23000 dead.
2007-02-22 22:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by maxpain_51 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. There were tons of casualties: all American!
Slaves died, free men died, women and children were killed. It was a horrible war.
2007-02-22 22:56:48 · answer #7 · answered by martinlh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-22 22:54:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. i think over one million people were killed. WWII couldn't even beat it.
2007-02-22 22:53:22 · answer #9 · answered by Jumping Martian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋