2007-02-22 14:39:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Both are different forms of literature. It's like comparing apples with oranges. I enjoy the layers of socio-political and religious intrigue in Dan Brown's books, and the quirky, fantastical world of Harry Potter equally.
2007-02-23 02:08:15 · answer #1 · answered by In-Sync 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not both? They are just too different to compare. Though I will admit if the new Dan Brown book, The Key of Solomon and the New Harry Potter book were out at the same time...I'd have a hard time deciding which to read first but I think i'd have to go with Harry Potter...I've gotta know what happens. LOL
2007-02-23 00:45:31 · answer #2 · answered by Jade D. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would take harry potter any day I do not and never heard of dan brown before so it would have to be harry potter.
2007-02-22 23:16:04 · answer #3 · answered by dawn_myhamsters 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harry Potter. Dan Brown's stories are good, but they always have something to do with religion and that's just.. annoying after a while...
2007-02-23 00:15:11 · answer #4 · answered by danemt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Dan Brown is an author and Harry Potter is a character.
I'm not a fan of Dan Brown, but I am a huge fan of J.K. Rowling.
2007-02-22 23:22:18 · answer #5 · answered by dark_reaction 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never heard of dan brown so i choose harry potter
2007-02-22 22:46:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe this! I havn't read any Dan Brown!! even with all the fuss about and around him....
so I Can't really vote...
but arn;t they two completely different types of literature?
2007-02-22 22:56:10 · answer #7 · answered by Mogli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
harry potter all the way
2007-02-22 22:47:06 · answer #8 · answered by lady luck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋