English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've noticed most of the Iraq war-hawks in Y.A......have zero interest in fighting in Iraq, much less joining the military. (As long as someone fights for them)

So will they actaully go fight in Iran and practice what they preach?

2007-02-22 14:34:01 · 24 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

CK4829....you are 100% correct!!

2007-02-22 14:39:39 · update #1

Six-foot2-midget....8 years USAF. See my 360, and prior blogs.

2007-02-22 14:40:48 · update #2

24 answers

Well, they haven't so far. They're just like their jackass mentor, Limbaugh: fat loudmouths without an ounce of integrity.
BTW, Liberals knew this war was wrong in the first place. Why on earth would they volunteer to go. The war was based on all lies and the intelligence was all fraudulent thanks to the V.P Cheney. We are against the war, why would we possibly go against our morals of killing people and fight an illegal war? Where as cons have been boasting about Bush and killing Iraqies and nuking them the entire 4 years since we started there. Why are they there fighting and living up to their so called beliefs? Could it be because they are scared little twerps and would rather someone else die for their beliefs without them having to leave the comfort of their armchair and computer screen. Yes, I think so.
BTW, if Bush does fire missles into Iran, this will blow up in his face and become an all out regional war that will include the entire mid-east. It's already happening in Iraq. The Saudi's are funding and giving arms to the Sunni's and Al Queda and factions in Iran are arming and funding the Shiites. It's already a regional war. But launching missles against Iran is going to escalate this war into an all out blood bath that expands the entire mid-east.

2007-02-22 14:37:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

I definitely have not proposed nor supported the belief of invading the two of those worldwide places. I additionally do no longer have faith that we could continually nevertheless be this heavily engaged in Iraq. we are seeing our superb risk for replace in Iran enjoying out earlier our eyes nonetheless and on a similar time as i do no longer think we could continually promptly intervene interior the affairs of this u . s . a . I do have faith the President could be displaying extra help for the liberty flow turning out to be there on a similar time as expressing harsh sentiment against the present regime's dealing with of the affair. Moose: I definitely have served my u . s . a . faithfully and honorably as have many different conservatives. My family individuals has properly over one hundred years of blended military provider to our credit. in fact my brother only back from Afghanistan a quick time in the past. earlier having the nerve to call others cowards why do no longer you provide us your military pedigree.

2016-11-25 01:11:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Im there. I bought the Iraqui vacation cause I heard it was never ending beach with alot of men (joke) Tee, Hee. Not funny but we made a good team and all came back alive. We had good command. A little crazy but sometimes that is what it takes. Every other unit talked **** about us but when it came to who was going to pull their protection they all wanted us. He*l yes. thats what is all about. teamwork that can work like one wave. Once you get to know eachothers thoughts and movements so well you know exactly what to do to make things fall into place.

2007-02-22 15:04:37 · answer #3 · answered by JAMI E 5 · 0 0

Very Very few, if any. Most of these "war-hawks," in a need to feel 'patriotic' curse liberals as cowards and unpatriotic in order to make themselves feel better about their own cowardliness and lack of guts to join the service.

At the same time, how many "anti-war hippies" would actually go out there, start petitions, go to protests, and really work to end the war. The answer: Very Very few, if any.

Most of both are too scared and lack the courage of their convictions.

I have both, honorably served in the military and protested the war. In case any of you Internet stone throwers, on both sides, were wondering.

Have a wonderful day!

2007-02-22 14:46:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I am conservative and 4 years ago I would have joined but a bad spinal disc and 35, so I didn't qualify.
I didnt join out of highschool and I really wish I would have now.
But at that time I was a liberal.

2007-02-22 14:57:37 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1 1

All of them, and us liberals too. It won't stay in the Middle East. Dearborn will be a detention camp, and even the most vocal Islamic
neo-con will be flashing a BLT just to blend into the local population.

An Iranian invasion by the U.S. will be nuclear with in the year. Putin has been rattling his 10,000 nuke saber like a salvation army Santa Claus in front of Macy's for the past month, its just that he can't get any U.S. media coverage, the Bushwacker is ignoring him.

2007-02-22 14:43:33 · answer #6 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 2 3

If you are posting the truth about your service...then you should know that the services are made up overwhelmingly of conservatives...a 4-1 ratio or better...so the question should be Will the liberal whiners do their share?

Or will they do as they always have run, hide, whine and complain...and above all...DO NOTHING BUT TALK.

2007-02-22 14:56:40 · answer #7 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 2 1

The answers I see from conservatives is how many democrats will serve if we invade. and they say zero. and I say exactly. Why should i serve in the army when I think the war they are fighting is illegal and if they invade iran it will be an even bigger mistake. The cons want to invade Iran then they can do it.

2007-02-22 14:44:11 · answer #8 · answered by jwk227 3 · 3 3

When your house catches fire, are you going to call the fire department and send someone else's poor kid to risk their life to put the fire out for you?

You don't have to join the military to have an opinion on which wars are worth fighting, any more than you have to be a cop to decide what crimes should be enforced. Your warped logic is typical of a liberal.

2007-02-22 14:44:34 · answer #9 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 5 2

I think some stragetic sorties are in order.. you know, bombing runs... not a full scale invasion. The goal isn't regime change, it's to stop the nuke program in its tracks.

2007-02-22 14:39:17 · answer #10 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers