Who thinks the judge did the right thing letting them bury Anna with her son??

Question

I do but i don't think Howard Stern should have anything to do with the decision.He seems to be after her money.I feel like he pushed her into more and more drugs and she really had lost control.He could have helped her but he pushed her to the point that she didn't even know what she was doing anymore.I think he did it on purpose and was after her money.....

Answer 1

i think he did the right thing, she needs to be layed by her son. i think that Howard stern killed her son and her. i think he knew what would happen and he would get sum money. i think the judge should court order whatever the child gets she cant have till she is 18. so her father cant touch it.

Answer 2

Without a doubt she should be buried with her son. It's the right thing to do. I don't think he handled the matter professionally but some say he acted they way he did to keep all parties "at ease" and hopefully work together in the Court Room to do what is best for Anna. In turn, he really didn't make the decision he pawned it off on the Guardian Ad Litem being that Dannielynn is the next of kin to discuss it with the 3 parties and come to an agreement. As far as your opinion of Howard Stern, I have to agree with you.

Answer 3

Testimony proved that no one told Anna what to do . Howard was just the scape goat for people looking to blame someone else . Two on opposing sides also agreed that Howard K. Stern was truly looking out for Anna's intentions . The judge finally made the right decision - although he should have released the remains to Howard K . outright . I imagine he wanted to please everybody - and was finally feeling the burden of the whole case .
Somehow , it would have been very wrong to bury her anywhere else , except near her son Daniel .

Answer 4

It was a good decision one that should have been made at least a week ago. That poor woman needed to be put to rest asap. It was confirmed by several witnesses that she wished to be buried beside her son. Why else would she have bought the plots? The way things were handled was nothing short of a circus act. It was shameful for her body to be held for so long that she is in the process of decaying. It just should have been common sense.

Answer 5

I think she would have wanted to be buried by her son too. But this whole thing has become such a media circus now. And if Howard K Stern is really the father, then why doesn't he just take the DNA test and end it all now!??

Answer 6

Absolutely best verdict I have seen in a very long time. She buried her son in the Bahamas and bought plots for her and her family.

Anna's mother is after money how could she pay for Anna's son to be brought back to the states and Anna too?

I have children too and sometime you just got to let go.

Anna May you finally rest in peace.

Answer 7

With this Judge who knew what could happened. He needs to retire into a mental health hospital, you know the one where they keep the doors locked.

Yes, the right things was done, she should be buried next to her son. Something is not right with these two cases?

Answer 8

I think it was a good call. I don't think the location had as much to do with it as the fact that her son was there. They were supposedly very close.

Answer 9

a good call on the judges part

Answer 10

I think the judge had no business making that decision in the first place. Also, she died in Florida and, according to Florida law, the body should have been given over to her mother, not that Howard Stern guy.