English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"Israel has nukes, why shouldn't Iran and North Korea?"
"The government orchestrated 9/11"-"Why do I need proof? It's just so obvious!"
"So Saddam was a genocidal dictator, at least he maintained order in Iraq."
"America should stop interfering in other countries affairs and let the UN do its job" -- "Why isn't America intervening in Darfur to stop the genocide."

2007-02-22 14:05:34 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

You would seem less dumb if you knew the true meaning of liberalism

2007-02-22 14:09:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 10

First of all, Liberalism has its roots in the Western Age of Enlightenment, but the term has taken on different meanings in different time periods.

Secondly, You ask that question like one person had said all those things. And, I really doubt they are exact quotes, rather they were taken out of context.
A true liberal doesn't think anyone should have nukes, let alone Israel, Iran or North Korea.
The question of whether the government orchestrated 9/11 or not doesn't have exact proof pointing to that. However, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence and circumstantial evidence that should warrent investigation into the matter.
The better question is why isn't the UN intervening into Darfur and why don't the rest of the countries in the UN, including the US give a damn? Oh yes, it's the oil factor.

2007-02-22 14:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Isreal has NUkes but are not threating their nieghbors with them. Only those who hate america & think we are the only evil ones in the world think the Us goverment was behind 9/11.Saddem maintained order because anyone who spoke bad about him had a very short life. Now they are free to say anything about anything & anybody.The US would not have to be in Iraq if the UN DID do its job. The job you say the UN is suppose to be doing also includes Darfur. All they seem to be doing now is talk , talk, TALK,And people keep dieing. How would the NAACP feel if a republican administration sent troops to Sudan. They would burn them on a stake. Only Democrates care about BLACKS.

2007-02-22 14:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 2 0

I agree with CC above those are all traits I have witnessed, Not by all liberal but the most vocal and the elites.

Amswerman? If Winkapedia is correct why do I often see liberals on TV shouting down conservatives? Why can't we have a free exchange of ideas?

2007-02-22 14:26:04 · answer #4 · answered by Luchador 4 · 1 0

No , by its very nature,its not possible. Liberal and Rational can not exist side by side. Just like Gay Man, the term is not possible.
Non binding resolution, what is that supposed to mean. The term
Honorable Senator, from New York, who can explain that term it
is not valid.Therefore, I answer no, it can not be rationally explained.

2007-02-22 14:27:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

actuality: The Afghani mujahedin - and the Taliban and al-Qaida- have been efficiently created via the CIA, it quite is Pakistani equivalent the ISI and Britian's MI6. In admitting this, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who replaced into President Jimmy Carter's national risk-free practices Adviser in the previous due 1970's, has disclosed Carter's secret directive to bankroll the mujahedin and usa's collaboration with 'Saudis, the Egyptians, the British, the chinese language (to start up) offering weapons to the mujahedin...... (Pilger, 364). "Freedom next Time." via John Pilger.

2016-12-17 16:45:30 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, Ann Coulter can explain Liberal ideology very well. And has numerous times in Best seller books.
They will say anything, do anything, that harms America. Homosexual marriage, adoption, and perverts in schools giving talks on subjects like fisting and the like. Anything that will damage the fabric of the country, they are for it. They call 9/11 victims little Eickmans, and root for our enemies much as college students root for their favorite team. They are in fact, anti-American scum.

2007-02-22 14:21:59 · answer #7 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 3 1

Liberalism has its roots in the Enlightenment thought of Europe, and in perhaps its purest form represents those ideas of faith in the goodness of human nature and generosity towards those who are less advantaged. In real world practice this tends to fail since human nature is not all good (or all evil, for that matter), and charity is seldom good for either the giver or the taker.

2007-02-22 14:21:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes, I can explain liberal ideology........... First of all, liberalism has socialistic and Marxist roots. The Democratic party has been influenced significantly by liberal thought and have become the Neo-Marxists of today. They have changed the party and made it Marxist leaning. George P. Lakoff from the University of California, Berkeley is one of the fathers of Neo-Marxism and the ACLU and is a major funding and enforcement body that influences liberal and Neo-Marxist thought in the US.

Liberals and Neo-Marxists believe in the following:

-- Christians are obstacles to an "enlightened" society
-- Drugs should be legalized
-- Homosexual marriage is equal to marriage between a man and a woman
-- Against states legally mandating that parents be informed when their underage daughters have abortions
-- Abortion is good for society and is not killing a human being
-- Euthanasia is also good for society and not killing a human being
-- America is harmful to the world
-- We should appease our enemies
-- People should be allowed into the US without legal process and there should be open borders
-- Large socialized & state run programs with high taxation are good for society such as socialized medicine, transportation, media, products and services.
-- Believe in "income redistribution"--that is, the government taxing affluent Americans at a higher proportional rate in order to fund entitlements to the less well off.

Neo-Marxists want to change America by weakening the country as a nation and significantly destroying the social fabric that has been been built over 200 years of our existence.

2007-02-22 14:08:57 · answer #9 · answered by ccguy 3 · 7 4

Rational and liberal. Isn't that an oxymoron?

2007-02-22 14:42:24 · answer #10 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1 0

I don't think "Liberal Ideology" can be explained. It goes against the very nature of things.

2007-02-22 14:14:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers