Please, explain the REAL evidence for your theory. Explain how Evolution broke almost all the laws of physics without the help of an Intelligent designer. Please leave out all "evidence that has been proved wrong over and over again." And if you believe in both God and evolution, please how did you come up with this conclusion?
2007-02-22 12:05:07 · 12 answers · asked by NOTW70X7 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
It really is so sad. I'll keep praying for you guys because that's the only thing I can do. I am not able to change a man's heart, only Jesus Christ can do that. I know you dont understand that but neither did I until it happened to me. It truely is sad how we can get so caught up in our pride and our so called "knowledge" that we think were smarter than the very God that created us.
The only response I have is simply this since you try to tell me that I am a moron for saying that evolution breaks the laws of physics. Please answer this, When is the begining without a supernatural begining. Everything has a begining. If evolution is so testable give me one factual example where something came from nothing, where it did not have a begining. Please "test" and explain in great detail. That's right, you can't. Why? Because it's not testable. I love science, but evolution is not science. It's a religion. The only reason it's still taught is because God is the only alternative.
2007-02-23 20:18:20 · update #1
There is nothing to explain which would allow you to believe in evolution. You have already determined that "the evidence that has been proved wrong over and over" is a reasonable proof - whatever you happen to be referring to.
But, if there is an intelligent designer, then where did the intelligent designer come from? Evolution is a theory that holds together in that it can be shown to be true in many cases. There is no proof of an intelligent designer. You cannot test an intelligent designer, but you can test evolution. So, an intelligent designer is an article of faith, but evolution is a question of science. If evolution is shown not to work, it will be discarded. But, an intelligent designer cannot be discarded because it is based on faith rather than facts.
They are two different things. Nonetheless, you could believe that an intelligent designer, which we can call God, could have created the Earth billions of years ago. And, life evolved from that initial creation without God having a direct hand in the creation of life. Still, it has been shown that amino acids can be formed from inorganic molecules under the right conditions. So, evolution is simpler and more basic that ascribing life to God.
If you believe in God, then you always will have the question of where did God come from? Evolution does not answer the question of the origins of the universe. In my way of thinking, believing in God tells you nothing about the origins of the universe either. At least with evolution, you have tools to solve real world problems. God seems to create more problems than she solves.
2007-02-22 12:18:35 · answer #1 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I do not understand the phrasing of this question. It is not possible to break any or almost all of the laws of physics. If a law of physics is 'broken' than the law was wrong in the first place. Nobody has shown that the theory of evolution has broken any law of physics and therefore it is impossible to prove them wrong. The ignorance of the person who asked this question is obvious in the way that it was phrased.
As for evolution versus creation:
Energy can not be created or destroyed. Therefore, it is not possible for anyone or anything to create something out of nothing...such as the human race.
2007-02-22 14:00:10 · answer #2 · answered by John L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, the Theory of Evolution is not my theory, it belongs to Science. Secondly, exactly which "laws of physics without the help of an Intelligent designer" were broken? And thirdly, please specify to what "evidence that has been proved (sic) wrong over and over again"? Perhaps you feel the dinosaurs died because they failed to make it onto Gilgamesh's Ark? What about the radioactive iridium that points to the meteorite striking the Yucatan Peninsula 67 million years ago. Are you going to attack the Sciences of Chemistry and Physics also. Why are you on the internet then? It is not mentioned in the Bible either. If you are going to attack a theory you must use science, not some vague allegations. Your ignorance of the methods of science shows your stupidity in attacking that about which you know nothing.
2007-02-22 13:20:35 · answer #3 · answered by Amphibolite 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The evidence has been shown many times over, some just choose not to believe it. How does evolution break the laws of physics. that doesnt make any sense. Maybe God has taken a hands off approach to the development of his creations. Without lifes ablity to adapt we would have no life at all. Give us a specific example of how elvolution has SCIENTIFICALLY been proven wrong. Belief in the divine creation and evolution is not mutually exclusive. You cant see the air you breath and it really doesnt matter if you believe if its there or not. Not believing in evolution isnt going to stop it from happening THANK GOD
2007-02-22 13:08:00 · answer #4 · answered by beano007 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since you seem to think that evolution broke "almost all" the laws of physics (that's a LOT of laws ... LOL), and since you seem to think that the evidence has "been proved wrong over and over again" ... you seem to be getting all of your "science" from BAD creationist web sites, not from any legitimate science source or education.
So although I could fill pages (and have) with the evidence, there is no way I can explain it to you. You are in such extreme denial, I could tell you that the sky is blue and you would say that this "had been proved wrong over and over."
- For example, I could show you photographs of dolphin embryos with legs, and you would deny it.
- Or explain that you have a muscle in your calf that is useless in humans but used for grasping in monkeys, and you would deny it.
- Or explain that we need a new flu shot every year because this year's flu viruses have evolved immunity to last-year's flu vaccine ... and you would deny it.
- Or explain how molecule-by-molecule difference and similarities in things like pancreatic proteins, insulin, the photopigments in our eyes, etc. etc. all show the exact degree of ancestry we share with each different primate ... and you would deny it.
There is no way to explain something to someone who has obviously made a life choice to close your mind.
----
As to how I can believe in God and evolution at the same time ... simple. God can create life any way He chooses. He can fashion it from mud, He can cook it up in a wok, or He can use evolution. The book of Genesis was an explanation of origins intended for bronze-age farmers who didn't have a word for "million" or "DNA" or "single-celled organism". Why does it say that it took God six days to create the universe and then had to "rest" on the seventh day? Why would an all-powerful God require more than an instant, and why would He require "rest"? Answer: The story of Genesis is trying to explain that the task of creating a universe to God is about the same amount of effort as planting a field to a farmer, or building a house to a carpenter. Why do people in 2007 still cling to a bronze-age farmer's view of God? Why do they limit Him so much?
Why would you insult God by denying the use of the *brain* he gave us? Science is a product of that brain. Those creationist sites you depend on are flat-out LYING to you if they are saying that the evidence has been "proved wrong" (no scientist would agree), or breaks ANY laws of physics, much less ALL of them. They are LYING to you. They know nothing of science. They are LYING to you.
2007-02-22 16:27:45 · answer #5 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution breaks none of the laws of physics - I have no idea where you get such stupid ideas. In particular, it is fully compliant with the second law of thermodynamics.
God, however, breaks almost all of the laws of physics, and hence cannot realistically be said to exist. There is no experimental verification of him.
Belief in god has also been the source of the vast majority of the evil done by man to man through history. Bad track record to have.
2007-02-22 21:11:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution has broken no law of physics that I know of. That is the point; you do not know physics or biology if you think the " evidence has been proved wrong over and over again ". Do you think that your strident ignorance is going to convince anyone of anything, except that you are ill educated.
2007-02-22 12:25:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
1) Think before you ask.
2) Learn something about Physics.
3) Learn something about Evolution.
2007-02-22 13:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by John W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure we'll explain evolution right after you prove that God is real.
2007-02-22 12:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There's all this concern about whether we were created, evolved, created and then evolved, yada, yada... Who has the best religion. My cross is bigger than your cross...
Meanwhile, everybody is still treating everybody else like crap.
2007-02-22 12:15:31 · answer #10 · answered by Veronica Almighty 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋