help with debate? topic is national service...?

Question

k now im on the pro side... here it is:

Topic: National Service

Resolved: The United States federal government should establish a policy substantially increasing the number of persons serving in one or more of the following national service programs: AmeriCorps, Citizen Corps, Senior Corps, Peace Corps, Learn and Serve America, Armed Forces.

so since im on pro, the basic argument is that im trying to back up why the US should establish a policy (eg. draft, but open to any other policy) increasing the # of ppl participating in national service. any reasons and solid evidence or backup is greatly appreciated...

Answer 1

Did you mean draft for the military? Definately not!! This country doesn't need to force its citizens into that sevice. The most important service or policy the government should lend its support to is volunterring somehow, and probably with Americorps or Citizen Corps at that!!

Answer 2

that's a complicated area to uphold. Any attorneys obtainable??? Scrooge??? ok, i assume i will positioned on the devil's recommend hat... I served 2 years in Americorps and that i think of the only unfavourable area that I observed in my particular difficulty is the place a unmarried mom of 5 chosen to do a 365 days of Americorps. Sounds very noble suitable? properly it may be if Americorps presented solid well-being reward and pay to help shield those 5 toddlers. It basically appeared unhappy to me that somebody could be prepared to be paid $8795 (then) for eleven months of artwork to assist her and her 5 toddlers, whilst a job at WalMart or McDonalds could have finished plenty greater for them. the tutorial stipend would have been waiting to help her get by college, yet attempting to positioned herself to make a greater suitable life for her and her toddlers had extreme short term expenditures. increasing the style of folk for those classes would cut back the selectivity. that's the previous, "get what you could". Say a small city non income has a furnish for 5 human beings to return artwork there, yet they basically discover 3 qualified for the positions. wanting to no longer lose the furnish, they pass all out attempting to discover everybody to take the interest, and what they get are 2 people who have not have been given any interest contained in this technique, basically want the deferred interest on their student loans and something to positioned on their resume. those 2 human beings would desire to avert the entire software. i comprehend that could be a stretch, i in my view think of the international of this technique. i replaced into an remarkable beginning to my profession and taught me greater desirable than 4 years of better practise ever would desire to. solid luck on the controversy, it sounds very exciting.