English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But they dont seem to mind when Obama, Bill Clinton or Gore admit to past drug use. (Obama admits to cocaine use).

2007-02-22 11:22:46 · 16 answers · asked by Dr Fred 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Enjoying the crazy conspiracy allegations to back up the hipocracy.

Im a conservative who has never smoked pot in 40 years, but I dont have a problem with others doing it.

I just find the double standard annoying.

2007-02-22 13:07:03 · update #1

I have been to several parties recently where I have seen pot and coke being used. Those who dont't know me well might suspect if I was at such parties like I often am, I used drugs. I have no proof that I have never used them but my word but I have seen them used hundreds of times, and many thousands of people saw me at events where drugs were used.

2007-02-22 13:12:54 · update #2

16 answers

They enjoy lying. You know that if Bush HAD ever used drugs, his enemies would have dug it up years ago & the mainstream media would repeat it every day. They haven't even managed to produce any forged evidence. Bush never used drugs.

2007-02-22 12:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 15 0

Obama has been in determination to artwork particularly over a month. GWB had 8 very long years to hold the economic kit into it quite is present day-day unhappy state. on an identical time as Roosevelt got here approximately of artwork after Hoover sent the country into the bathroom, amnesiac republicans reported the comparable drained previous speil you're spouting now. The economic kit will take months if not over a 300 and sixty 5 days to get extra useful, and the republicans could be nowhere in sight for credit.

2016-12-17 16:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There's no doubt about it. But Bush never has admitted his drug use. I wouldn't necessarily rule out any candidate for using illegals drugs in their younger days. Bush seems to have had a Bush much bigger problem with illegal drugs and alchohol (legal drug) over a much longer period of time to the point where being a his "dry drunk" is defined a major concern and it effects his conduct in office. I will say that CLinton seems to have some major issues with sex that did affect his conduct and I don't give him a pass for that. He could have been a much more effective president if he didn't have that problem.

2007-02-22 11:34:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

1) It's not just the drugs. Chicken George went AWOL, and he raped a woman and forced her to have an abortion. He also did business with Osama bin Laden and the terrorist bank, the BCCI.

2) Why don't you stop harping about Clinton and Lewinsky?

Better yet, why are you hiding behind you computer like a coward instead of signing up for military service in Iraq? If you love Bu**sh** so much, go fight in his war.


.

2007-02-22 11:35:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Its all people who are devoid of any substance. They dont have any issues, they just hate someone and its the only thing they can think of for a put down.

I don't care if obama did a little coke years ago, I don't care of georgie tipped the bottle, or if bill did or didn't inhale.
It was in their youth, years before the time at hand. And none of them to public knowledge are doing it now.

2007-02-22 11:28:26 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1 2

GW was arrested for cocaine possession back in 1973 in Houston.
He served 1,000 hours of community service at an inner city poverty center (Operation PULL, i believe).
Even though he was an adult, his daddy's friends managed to lose the criminal conviction records.
GW's cocaine use is so widely documented it's almost legendary.
Same with his drunk driving convictions, 2 that we know of.
GW is fair game for ridicule because he holds himself out to be this moral superior man who is constant conversations with God, while the truth is he's a hypocritical scumbag.

2007-02-22 11:50:44 · answer #6 · answered by gw_bushisamoron 4 · 2 1

For the same reasons republicans still blame Clinton for everything, to create an argument.

2007-02-22 11:35:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bush denies it. There is a difference. Then when he half way admits it he chalks it up to youthful indiscretions despite being 40 at the time of his alcohol problem.

There is a difference between admitting you did something and not trying to hide it, and well hiding it and lying about it.

2007-02-22 11:28:51 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4 1

the same reason the cons harp on clinton having sex in white house, same reason cons harp on hillary being bills wife, same reason cons harp on about any democrat using drugs..

something to complain about and plus if its the truth why keep quiet about it?

2007-02-22 11:59:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i don't get it either...i mean there are so many other things to harp on Bush about....him being a liar, a war monger, killing tens of thousand of innocent people and almost 4000 troops that have died because of his war, and not to mention him being a complete and utter moron...i mean the list is endless!

2007-02-22 11:31:28 · answer #10 · answered by Paulien 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers