do you think when it comes to leadership, Hitler was a good leader? Why?

Answer 1

He was a lousy leader in the sense that he refused to listen to his military commanders that were not only schooled in the art of tactics, but he placed many of them in the positions they occupied, yet refused to take heed to their recommendations. For instance, D-Day Invasion and attacking Russians in the winter. All of his commanders advised him on what moves to make and he did the exact opposite and look what happened!

His scientist pleaded with him to create an atomic bomb since they had the know how and technology, but once again his arrogance was more important.

In his quest to be known as a man that made all the right decisions, his dream of Nazi's ruling for 1000 years only lasted 14.

Answer 2

As a leader, yes. Good? Not even close...

If he had really cared for the well being of the German people (and btw, he was Austrian) after the defeat of WW1 and all that came with that, he should have foreseen that there was no way the rest of the world would have stood by and not counter-acted his ideas. Instead, he dragged a whole nation into such a historic downfall of attrocious, embarassing and inhuman action that even after 60+ years, Germany is still paying for it.
So yes, he was A LEADER of sorts for he managed to hoodwink a very ancient and powerfull nation into waging war on the rest of the world, but no, he wasn't a GOOD and certainly not intelligent or wise leader who by his actions will always be portrayed as the essence of evil.

(maybe, he should have stuck to being an architect!)

Answer 3

Well he was the best general that the Nazis had at the strategic level and by 1938 he had expanded the Reich to include Moravia and Bohemia and Austria. So if he died and or stopped there he would have left the Germans at an advantage compeered to what it had before him. Instead he went on to destroy his own people in wars of conquest and in death camps. (Jews were part of the German Nation State.) And he destroyed much of the infrastructure of the nation (Most was destroyed in the Bombings-allied.) in order to prevent the allies from having any advantage to gain from victory (Or anything with which to negotiate). If it was not for Albert Spear and some pro-German more than Nazi goligthers the Germans would not have been left with as much (or as little) as they had. Hitler also commenting from his bunker said something to the effect that: "All the valuable Germans have already died in the war those that remain are worthless, they don't deserve anything". (See: Inside the Third Reich, by Albert Spear-He was the Nazi war productions minister.)

So, what can one say about a man that destroys his cities and nation?
Hitler was a genius of a man endowed by God with many abilities and talents he used these to destroy his fellow man and his own nation. He must therefore be regarded as a bad leader for he led his people to an evil end.
Had it not been for the graciousness and goodness of the Americans the German people would have suffered what they deserved to suffer.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 4

Not really because he has lots of powers (being the leader of the bad people)he's not as nice the other people and when he can be a leader,perhaps we would have bloods on the streets and even in our own houses.If he was trying to become a leader i will not vote for him

Answer 5

Although his motives were evil (hatred of the Jews), He was powerful because he knew how to manipulate the media, deliver arousing speeches, unite a nation, supress the Christian Church and move very fast militarily. However, as a leader, he was a complete failure because he set out to do what God Himself and promised would never happen, the destruction of the Jews. He was a horrible leader for leading people against God Himself.

Answer 6

No! He replaced into no longer a reliable chief! What kind of question is this. He killed tens of millions of human beings! properly wait a 2d they have been in simple terms Jews. i assume to three of you that could make him the guy of the 20 th century. shall we build a park to him and have a Hitler Day Parade. shall all of us flow all the way down to Wal-mart and purchase little stick on mustaches, and a few off those piped brown pants. happy Krystal evening shall all of us say and bake truffles in the form of the swastika. Oh and then shall all of us watch strikes of his little dance he did whilst France surrendered, and snigger! and then shall all of us say what an spectacular chief he replaced into! Oh do no longer forget approximately the ever crowed suitable pin the movie star on the Holocaust sufferer. Hitler a reliable chief? To hell with Hitler. He have been given what he needed, a bullet in the pinnacle. end of tale

Answer 7

in leadership i would reluncantly say yes, only because he knew how to get people to agree to his ideas and kinda 'herd' the sheep. how else would he convince people to commit genocide. one would have to be a really good propanganda-nist (is that a word?) to convince so MANY people. also the circumstances did help. people were more willing to rally around a leader bc germany was under a terrible economic situation in post WWI. and yea.

edit: woah the guy before me stole my analogy....

Answer 8

if by leader you mean leading people around like sheep, than yes

Answer 9

No, he murdered millions and plunged the whole world into war. 'Nuf sed.

Answer 10

NO! HE WAS A KILLER! HE CAUSED THE HOLOCAUST. IM GLAD HE KILLED HIMSELF ADOLF U WERE A DISGRACE U ALMOST KILLED ME U SHOULD KILL U AGAIN THANKS FIR ***** UP MY LIFE!