Is it because the Iraq government is stable and foreign troops are no longer needed?
2007-02-22 10:10:31 · 12 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Drew, don't get me wrong. I favor the TOTAL and IMMEDIATE withdrawal of ALL foreign fighters from Iraq.
Does Blair agree with me all of a sudden, or has the Iraqi civil war suddenly stopped and nobody told us?
2007-02-22 10:19:24 · update #1
Look into the history of the British army in Palestine. They are being smart by letting America stay stuck in the middle of what is becoming a civil war.
2007-02-22 10:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by Niklaus Pfirsig 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You already know the answer... you just see and hear what you want to see and hear. The area around Basra that the British have been patrolling is much calmer than Baghdad, and they have the Iraqi forces in place to handle it, so they are gradually moving some troops out. When we get Baghdad calmer and get Iraqi forces ready to take over, we will start doing the same thing. Unfortunatly, people like you will still claim that we are failing because your only agenda is seeing Bush lose. You don't give a damn about our forces or their mission or the Iraqi people or anything else.... you just want your President to lose, and that is very sad.
2007-02-22 10:44:35 · answer #2 · answered by mmilner_24 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Britian has 7000 troops in Iraq now and by the summer they will have brought 1500 back to England, a plan that was in the works a long time ago. Ergo: 5500 will remain!
2007-02-22 10:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. Listen up liberals. Britain is pulling out 1500 troops. Handing over what they were doing to the Iraqis.
THERE NOT LEAVING TOTALLY.
THERE NOT ABANDONING BUSH.
THIS IS NOT A BUSH FAILURE.
Got it. 1500 of the 7100 are leaving.
2007-02-22 10:17:46 · answer #4 · answered by Chester's Liver 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen to Blair's speech to the House of Lords.
"There are no insurgents and there is no AlQuieds threat"
Go big Red Go
2007-02-22 10:15:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing that cracks me up more than your ridiculous answers are the questions you ask! I KNEW this would happen! No sooner does the slow withdrawl of troops from Iraq begin to start, than liberals and hippies begin to question it. I wish you people would make up your mind!
2007-02-22 10:14:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it fairly is heavily one-sided thinking. think of this place from Blair's attitude. He sees united statesa. actually ripping itself into shreds in simple terms attempting to establish no count if or to no longer deliver in extra troops. you notice human beings die each and on a daily basis. in spite of if it fairly is an American or British, it fairly is nevertheless a existence! Blair additionally sees the protests from very nearly each and each united states. there's a lot of surveys performed on the Iraq conflict, in simple terms slightly extra beneficial than 0.5 consents with Bush's theory. Invading Iraq has been a mistake. think of approximately it. what's the reason to invade Iraq. it fairly is Bush's clarification: To seize the chief of Al Qaeda who's hiding in Iraq, we ought to invade Iraq. you will possibly be dissatisfied that your relative has been KIA, yet do you comprehend what proportion Iraq civilain deaths there have been? for style of each and each NATO soldier killed, approximately thousands of civilians have died. how are you able to justify this destruction? You blame the militants. If Iraq have been to invade united statesa., might you combat on your death to guard united statesa.? lower back to Blair, he feels the rigidity, he doubts Bush's coverage, human beings in Britain is very nearly yelling at him to convey their sons lower back from wars that they had no relation of. actual, Blair is Bush's best chum. actual lower back, as an best chum he ought to help. yet could no longer Blair help in different methods? supply nutrition? supply ammo? you are able to't justify bringing different international locations right into a conflict which you started. Al Qaeda bombed the international commerce centre. this is incredibly evil. You took revenge and killed a lot extra and have a lot casualties. How do you justify that?
2016-10-16 06:48:13 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe Bush is asking the British to move up to Baghdad, but Blair doesn't want to.
2007-02-22 10:18:37 · answer #8 · answered by SJohnson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the majority of Britons want them out. Their government listens to its people.
2007-02-22 10:17:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's because Prince Harry won't have to go.
2007-02-22 10:14:09 · answer #10 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋