English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

so was it the right decision to let anna be buried with her son?

2007-02-22 09:50:29 · 14 answers · asked by mishoney 4 in News & Events Media & Journalism

14 answers

I believe he made the right decision.

2007-02-22 09:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 0 0

The judge was a joke, the trial was a joke. Anna should be with her son. period. Your question was about the judge, I just have to say one or two other things. Anna had a falling out with her mom before she met Stern. It looks like Larry may be the daddy, and that would be a good thing. I also know that if Larry is the daddy that Hugh Hefner will pay to have Anna and Danny brought back to Ca. and buried where she and Danny were happy. Think we can all agree that Stern was a leach and kept her high as a kite for his own gain.

2007-02-22 10:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by lucysmom 4 · 0 0

It was the right decision, what is so wrong is how he handled it making it a total circus. It could have been resolved in a couple of hours because the law states the the next of kin is the baby girl and since she is too young to make a decision, the guardian of that child makes the decision for her. But all this wanna be actor judge did was make her look like the freak she was in death as she was in life. Too drag out so much stuff when the woman is dead and not alive to defend herself in front of the public just shows how degrading our society is. Furthermore, I can't believe we have judges like this, clowns and idiots, we are now the laughing stock of the world, if this is the democracy we are trying to show the world to get into, no wonder they want no part of it and hate our culture and the way we do things. Although she was a freak, she was an individual with rights and every human being deserves respect, dead or alive. May she rest in peace with her son.

2007-02-22 10:16:44 · answer #3 · answered by diehard0603 4 · 0 0

He rendered his decision based on his emotions, not based on existing laws of the U.S, of which Anna Nicole was a citizen of.
If I were the presiding judge, I would release the body of Anna Nicole to her mother. No matter what happened in the past between Mrs. Arthur and Anna, the fact still remains that they have the strongest tie with each other compared to Anna's relationship with Howard K. Stern and even the baby's court-appointed guardian.

Arriving at such a decision which I would have pronounced if I were the judge, it is. in my opiniion, the most equitable and reasonable, if not totally legally justifiable.

2007-02-22 10:23:26 · answer #4 · answered by Belen 5 · 0 0

I think he made the wrong decision for several reasons. Two of them would be that it appears that Birkhead is the father. So if he gets custody of the baby, and he moves her back to California or Kentucky, the child well still have to travel to the Bahamas if Smith gets buried there, when it comes time to see her brother and mothers graves.

Second, since Stern isn't really a legal resident of the Bahamas, that has not even been established yet, he does not own the current home he is in-when he gets evicted, where will he go?
It was clear that he doesn't have a job and that Smith supported him. So where will he live ? If he's forced to move back to the states, who thinks he will have the money to exhume two bodies and bring them back there for burial? I don't think his family will pay for that.

It doesn't even appear as if the Judge thought of these things in his decision.

2007-02-22 10:01:04 · answer #5 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

i think the judge from 1 to 10, below 0 I think they should dig the son up from his grave. Take Anna and Daniel to Texas and be buried where the mother wants her daughter buried. Daniel didn't like the Bahamas, He only went there to visit his mother. His mother stayed so high she had no clue. She wouldn't have hated her mother so much if she were in her right state of mind. Virgie lost her daughter to fame, and drugs, and money long ago. If Anna could be alive again after being dead and without drugs, she'd hug her mom. After all Virgie raised Daniel from birth to age 7. How bad could the woman be?

2007-02-22 10:03:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

all the solutions so a recommendations have alot of reliable factors,yet in my opinion i'd have truly glanced at a rerun of regulation and Order I absolutely have not at all considered a spectacle extra amateurish in a lengthy time period on television and Matt Lauer on NBC had the nerve to ask this morning ,why is the wide-spread public so infatuated with the Anna Nicole scenario or words to that influence,and that i imagine its the media it really is flogging this portion of death no longer the wide-spread public,the media has been shoving this element down our throats because day one,very last time I checked an recommended public have a life of their own.i assumed the entire element turned right into a disgraceful attempt for rankings and the Schmuck decide became superb,it would were a comedy tutor.

2016-12-04 19:41:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

this judge was even worse than OJ's judge. TV cameras sure make people put on a show. Judge Seidlin is crazy enough to get his on judgeship on TV but thank goodness we can change channels and not have to watch.

2007-02-22 17:02:58 · answer #8 · answered by reece 1 · 0 0

A complete incompetent nincompoop It was so obvious he had
the hots for Sterns lawyer I though it was embarrassing.
His 15 minutes of fame in his acting audition should be handed over to Simon of American Idol..

2007-02-22 15:56:27 · answer #9 · answered by Robert B 5 · 0 0

he needs to be shot. for his piss poor acting. never seen a judge carry on like the way he did. no tear crying. i have never seen a judge cry about a damn thing,.

2007-02-22 09:55:44 · answer #10 · answered by duc602 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers